Chiefs All 4 SB will be against just 2 teams - Page 3

The 49ers twice and now the Eagles twice. Well...at least we get to prove the first time wasn't a fluke. Lol

(Yes...I know this probably wasn't worthy of it's own thread)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry:
Royals need to lose in the World Series to some different cities so the Chiefs can avenge them in the Super Bowl

I've given it a lot of thought, and I can't think of a single team I want the Royals to lose to.
[Reply]

All four? Are we assuming Chiefs defeat the "Elgses" in two weeks and just pretending Tampa Bay never happened?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by el borracho:
All four? Are we assuming Chiefs defeat the "Elgses" in two weeks and just pretending Tampa Bay never happened?

There was a Super Bowl against Tampa Bay?
[Reply]

I'm bummed about the lack of diversity.

I wish the Lions won the NFCCG last year and maybe the Rams/Commanders this season. In fact, we just missed the Rams in 2018 and 2021.
[Reply]

Am I the only person who does not care one iota who they play in the Super Bowl?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Gary Cooper:
I'm bummed about the lack of diversity.

I wish the Lions won the NFCCG last year and maybe the Rams/Commanders this season. In fact, we just missed the Rams in 2018 and 2021.

A healthy Lions team this year would be the toughest to beat in the super bowl...thankfully they didn't make it.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Some will, for sure, but he’s beaten Allen, Burrow and Lamar enough times that I think that’ll just be a small pocket of idiots.

Agree, small pocket of idiots will but most with any sense know better.
Mahomes has beaten the 3 other QBs considered the "rest of the best" in the league in consecutive AFCCGs to reach the superbowl:

2022 def Burrow
2023 def Jackson
2024 def Allen

Think about that. Unreal stuff.
Doesn't matter who he faces in the Superbowl,, he's gone through the other "top QBs" in the AFC/NFL to get there 3 years in a row.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Am I the only person who does not care one iota who they play in the Super Bowl?

This. Go get the win and make history...I do not give a flying fuck against who...what I care about is that the Chiefs are there.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Am I the only person who does not care one iota who they play in the Super Bowl?

Generally speaking, no, but I really do despise Eagles fans.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Generally speaking, no, but I really do despise Eagles fans.

Me too. Can't stand them. Can't stand Sirianni.

But at the end of the day, it's about victory. They can beat anybody and I don't care who it is. Just win baby!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by el borracho:
All four? Are we assuming Chiefs defeat the "Elgses" in two weeks and just pretending Tampa Bay never happened?

Yes.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Raiderhater:
There was a Super Bowl against Tampa Bay?

Doesn't ring a bell...
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Me too. Can't stand them. Can't stand Sirianni.

But at the end of the day, it's about victory. They can beat anybody and I don't care who it is. Just win baby!

The NFL gods aren't letting Sirianni win a SB, cmon.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
I predict the future knock on Mahomes will be that he “never beat a great QB in the Super Bowl”.

Because he already beat the great QBs in the playoffs. Allen, Jackson, Burrow.....
[Reply]

The only thing that can beat KC is KC.

You know Sirianni was praying to face McDerpitt and the Billdos over Andy and the Reaper.

If acting like a complete douchebag on the sidelines contributed to winning football games I'd be concerned.

The Eagles aren't ready for KC.

They beat up a wounded Packers team, got absolutely all they wanted from the freaking Rams, and then beat up the 6th seed Commanders who fumbled the football away like you get a bonus for it.

Jones, Karlaftis, Omenihu will be all over Hurts if that o line can't perform any better than what they did against the Rams. Spags has to be loving his pressure packages right now.
[Reply]