Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
What role do you see for Worthy in the NFL?
#1 WR
#2 WR
Slot/Gadget?
I don't think he can be WR1, and at this point I don't particularly see him as a WR2.
But, he is more of a threat than a regular WR3.
So, more than a slot or gadget guy, and with NFL coaches, trainers, and nutritionists, he is bound to get a little bigger, and stronger.
I imagine if Hardman was a Pro Bowl returner his rookie year, Worthy could do that, plus he is more of a true receiver than Hardman.
I like Mitchell better, because he has size, and is a smooth route runner. In this offense, with Kelce and Mahomes to help him learn to attack zones, he compliments Rice, and the rest of the offense better.
Earlier someone said he was like Tee Higgins, and meant it as a bad thing, but if Mitchell was Higgins, and we could have 5 years of control, I would take that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
That seems to actually be a common hot take right now.
I think Nabers is a WR1 in most drafts, and I absolutely love him, so I get it.
I just don't think you can pass up Harrison when he's so fucking safe.
Yeah, I'm not there yet, but I was about a week ahead of Draft Twitter on it. It was one of those 'don't believe my lying eyes' things where I thought "nah - I can't actually be seeing what I think I'm seeing, do I? - Nabers is !@#$ing amazing..."
Since it ultimately won't be me that gets fired, I have no problem saying I think it. I probably agree with you - if I'm sitting there at 4 after 3 quarterbacks have come off the board, I don't think I can possibly pass on him. Taking Harrison and having Nabers be better won't get you fired. But taking Nabers and having Harrison be better just might. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic:
I don't think he can be WR1, and at this point I don't particularly see him as a WR2.
But, he is more of a threat than a regular WR3.
So, more than a slot or gadget guy, and with NFL coaches, trainers, and nutritionists, he is bound to get a little bigger, and stronger.
I imagine if Hardman was a Pro Bowl returner his rookie year, Worthy could do that, plus he is more of a true receiver than Hardman.
I like Mitchell better, because he has size, and is a smooth route runner. In this offense, with Kelce and Mahomes to help him learn to attack zones, he compliments Rice, and the rest of the offense better.
Earlier someone said he was like Tee Higgins, and meant it as a bad thing, but if Mitchell was Higgins, and we could have 5 years of control, I would take that.
I don't hate Worthy I just don't see how what he does is more valuable than a guy that projects as a #1 WR. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Yeah, I'm not there yet, but I was about a week ahead of Draft Twitter on it. It was one of those 'don't believe my lying eyes' things where I thought "nah - I can't actually be seeing what I think I'm seeing, do I? - Nabers is !@#$ing amazing..."
Since it ultimately won't be me that gets fired, I have no problem saying I think it. I probably agree with you - if I'm sitting there at 4 after 3 quarterbacks have come off the board, I don't think I can possibly pass on him. Taking Harrison and having Nabers be better won't get you fired. But taking Nabers and having Harrison be better just might.
Nabors IS amazing. But he's not Harrison Jr. amazing.
IMO, Harrison is to Julio Jones like Nabors is to Sammy Watkins. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Yeah, I'm not there yet, but I was about a week ahead of Draft Twitter on it. It was one of those 'don't believe my lying eyes' things where I thought "nah - I can't actually be seeing what I think I'm seeing, do I? - Nabers is !@#$ing amazing..."
Since it ultimately won't be me that gets fired, I have no problem saying I think it. I probably agree with you - if I'm sitting there at 4 after 3 quarterbacks have come off the board, I don't think I can possibly pass on him. Taking Harrison and having Nabers be better won't get you fired. But taking Nabers and having Harrison be better just might.
Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic:
I don't think he can be WR1, and at this point I don't particularly see him as a WR2.
But, he is more of a threat than a regular WR3.
So, more than a slot or gadget guy, and with NFL coaches, trainers, and nutritionists, he is bound to get a little bigger, and stronger.
I imagine if Hardman was a Pro Bowl returner his rookie year, Worthy could do that, plus he is more of a true receiver than Hardman.
I like Mitchell better, because he has size, and is a smooth route runner. In this offense, with Kelce and Mahomes to help him learn to attack zones, he compliments Rice, and the rest of the offense better.
Earlier someone said he was like Tee Higgins, and meant it as a bad thing, but if Mitchell was Higgins, and we could have 5 years of control, I would take that.
Unless the reports are way off, he's much, much faster than Higgins. [Reply]