Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
It was ruled that he had possession while he was lying on the ground and there was not one replay there sufficient to overturn that ruling.
We all know what happened there
There was no possession. Complete the process of the catch to the ground… didn’t come close to that threshold.
When your only argument is “that was the original call on the field”… that confirms you have no argument for actual possession. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
As soon as his ass touches down with the ball it's a TD. He had possession at the high point when he caught it and tucked it.
But he didn’t have possession of the ball… it was not secured, which is how Miami’s player ran out of the pile with the ball. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
Original call on the field is literally all that matters if you don’t have a replay sufficient to overturn the call on the field.
This is how replay works in football, unless of course you are a power school and you need to keep racking up wins to get in the CFP
If the original call is blatantly incorrect… which in this case it was… it’s an easy overturn… are you new to instant replay? [Reply]
Originally Posted by FloridaMan88:
But he didn’t have possession of the ball… it was not secured, which is how Miami’s player ran out of the pile with the ball.
He did when he caught it at the high point. I just told you twice. [Reply]
Originally Posted by FloridaMan88:
If the original call is blatantly incorrect… which in this case it was… it’s an easy overturn… are you new to instant replay?
Nothing on any replay showed any call on the field was “blatantly incorrect”
Again, this is how replay works in football and why the call on the field is so important. It didn’t work that way this time. Don’t think it’s much of a mystery as to why that is [Reply]
