Can you do a GIF of the 3rd and forever play that he almost converted? Niners had coverage 20+ yards downfield and he still almost pulled it off. Receiver caught the ball out of bounds. Believe it was Tyreek, maybe? If I remember right Pat threw that ball while rolling left.
It's one of his "incompletions" that kind of makes your jaw drop lol. Eh just gonna roll left and throw an accurate laser 30+ yards downfield across my body...no big deal [Reply]
You can tell he purposely didn’t try to lead Hill to the end zone as the DB was making a bee line backwards with no concern of actually being on Hill but instead just wanting to be behind him. So that was actually somewhat of an underneath pass which is hilarious given it was 50 yards. That’s an interesting method of taking advantage of how deep the defense is playing. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DRM08:
Can you do a GIF of the 3rd and forever play that he almost converted? Niners had coverage 20+ yards downfield and he still almost pulled it off. Receiver caught the ball out of bounds. Believe it was Tyreek, maybe? If I remember right Pat threw that ball while rolling left.
It's one of his "incompletions" that kind of makes your jaw drop lol. Eh just gonna roll left and throw an accurate laser 30+ yards downfield across my body...no big deal
I think that was to Watkins but yea that gave me wood aswell despite being incomplete [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
my god this is the money shot...it's spielbergian
You can barely see it on these gifs since they cut it off, but right at the end Sherman, who had the ball zip right by him, has his own Roby moment reaction with his hands like, “really?” [Reply]
Originally Posted by mr. tegu:
You can barely see it on these gifs since they cut it off, but right at the end Sherman, who had the ball zip right by him, has his own Roby moment reaction with his hands like, “really?”
Wish we had a better view of that. Got a feeling Sherman isn't the only HOFer that Mahomes is gonna make look stupid over the next 15 years. :-) [Reply]
