We are still superior with our average QB. Better roster and QB WITHOUT Mahomes developing. Better at most positions and it's not close. WHEN he does develop :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
We are still superior with our average QB. Better roster and QB WITHOUT Mahomes developing. Better at most positions and it's not close. WHEN he does develop :-)
Enh, debatable... 2017 is soon upon us and then we'll have an idea as to what these teams look like.
Our 7th round second year QB > than your average decade plus starter.
RBs ... up for debate.
WRs ... Denver.
Defense ... hell, call it a wash, they're both damn good. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Enh, debatable... 2017 is soon upon us and then we'll have an idea as to what these teams look like.
Our 7th round second year QB > than your average decade plus starter.
RBs ... up for debate.
WRs ... Denver.
Defense ... hell, call it a wash, they're both damn good.
Defense:
Safeties- KC
Corners- Denver (Although Terrance Mitchell looked really good last year. I'd say better than Peters)
Linebackers- KC. Von very slightly edges a healthy Houston, but Ford is better than an unproven Ray. If DJ is healthy KC wins the linebacker debate
DL- Denver. KC had guys hurt last year and we lost Poe.
Offense.
WR- Denver
TE- KC
Line- KC
QB- Toss up. I think Semen is and will be comparable to Smith in the future.
RB- Toss up, although KC did improve in the draft with this position.
I think both teams are pretty even, but for some reason I feel like KC matches up very well with Denver. Denver has lockdown corners, but KC doesn't really run an offense that caters to Denver's strengths. We run the ball, throw a lot of quick passes and usually don't turn the ball over. [Reply]