SHOWTIME 05:05 PM 03-09-2025
Tampering period starts tomorrow 12PM EST. Put all non-Chiefs related free agent signings here.
[Reply]
BryanBusby 02:02 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by MahomesKnows:
Wow I wonder if they would have sent him to us? Cost is probably huge
Not a fucking chance.
[Reply]
pugsnotdrugs19 02:04 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch:
2nd, 3rd, and swap of 4ths.
That’s quite a bit but. Woulda looked at that one long and hard.
Doubt HOU would do it.
[Reply]
UChieffyBugger 02:04 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
**** man, that woulda been nice.
Probably woulda cost a ton. Very curious what Houston is doing there.
30 years old on a huge contract and having to give up picks?
:-)
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 02:06 PM Yesterday
But why though? That OL sucked at the other 4 positions.
[Reply]
staylor26 02:07 PM Yesterday
Why are the Texans trading away a LT when OL is by far their biggest weakness?
[Reply]
Washington thinks they're close...
[Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Why are the Texans trading away a LT when OL is by far their biggest weakness?
It seems they're admitting they aren't that close.
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 02:08 PM Yesterday
That's insanity though. Stroud regressed horribly in large part due to that OL being terribad.
[Reply]
Grady Jarrett heads to Chicago, NFC North is gonna be murder.
[Reply]
pugsnotdrugs19 02:09 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
30 years old on a huge contract and having to give up picks? :-)
30 is nothing for a great left tackle.
[Reply]
Damn Tunsil would have been a exactly what Pat needs.
[Reply]
FloridaMan88 02:11 PM Yesterday
Tunsil was not good last year… led the league in penalties.
[Reply]
pugsnotdrugs19 02:12 PM Yesterday
It does say a lot that Houston would do this. Like they must really hate the outlook of Tunsil being on their roster.
[Reply]
Houston spent alot of money last year, looks like a pivot after an all in year.
[Reply]
Houston gets a 2 and a 4 next year and a 3 this year...pretty sure if the Chiefs asked it'd have been more.
[Reply]