Originally Posted by :
A 28-year-old Lake Charles-area woman faces a bevy of charges after Louisiana police said she repeatedly had sex with a 13-year-old boy who she met at the Bible camp where she was a teacher/aide.
According to the Sulphur Daily News, Heather Daughdrill initiated the relationship in June and it continued until a complaint was filed in October. After her arrest on November 29, police told the paper that Daughdrill would pick her victim up from school without his parents' knowledge and subject him to sexual encounters. Louisiana cops also reportedly found sexually explicit texts between Daughdrill and her victim.
Originally Posted by TimBone:
In my honest opinion, a lot of times when older men hear of a story where a 30 year old got caught banging a 17 year old, they act disgusted to mask their jealousy.
I don't think there are a ton of 30 year old men that would turn down sex from a well developed 17 year old if there would be no repercussions involved.
Now, once a guy has a daughter of his own, that might change his views. But other than that, I'm willing to bet a high percentage of dudes (especially the ones that act disgusted when they read stories about it) would tap a 17 year old in a heartbeat.
I had this conversation once with someone about turning down a hottie underage and he was like, "once you have a daughter yourself, things change." I thought, sure but it's not like the girl who is gunning for a good time is your daughter or that you would be attracted to your daughter before the other girl came in. It's like seeing your daughter when you are having sex with your wife, it doesn't happen.
You see the girl that is before you, I suppose. The girl is either bangable or not and you either oppose doing it with underage or you don't. I don't see how not wanting any other guy to be on your daughter or seeing your daughter grow as a person affects it. Anyone who is not my daughter, is not my daughter, so I don't put them in her position. Now, knowing children's psychology, etc. can affect things, but the love of your daughter only stops you from banging your daughter. Other moral feelings like age-wise or cheating is what would change your response to an underage trying to have sex with you. And if 17, I think it would be the same as 18, unless, I suppose, it were in the context of a school setting and that was your thing.
Having said that, I've never done that or been tempted by anyone that age with me (meaning them come onto me). I have no game and am married with kids. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
It must be awful for them, I cant imagine all of the years of therapy its going to take to make them whole again.
What if the therapist is a hottie? That would just cause irreparable harm and trauma. Oh no, is it going to happen again right now? Do I take off my pants or do you? Argh! [Reply]
Can someone please post a rogues gallery of all the teachers that have been caught in this thread. Would be interested in seeing if the trend is up or down. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCSLC2008:
I had this conversation once with someone about turning down a hottie underage and he was like, "once you have a daughter yourself, things change." I thought, sure but it's not like the girl who is gunning for a good time is your daughter or that you would be attracted to your daughter before the other girl came in. It's like seeing your daughter when you are having sex with your wife, it doesn't happen.
You see the girl that is before you, I suppose. The girl is either bangable or not and you either oppose doing it with underage or you don't. I don't see how not wanting any other guy to be on your daughter or seeing your daughter grow as a person affects it. Anyone who is not my daughter, is not my daughter, so I don't put them in her position. Now, knowing children's psychology, etc. can affect things, but the love of your daughter only stops you from banging your daughter. Other moral feelings like age-wise or cheating is what would change your response to an underage trying to have sex with you. And if 17, I think it would be the same as 18, unless, I suppose, it were in the context of a school setting and that was your thing.
Having said that, I've never done that or been tempted by anyone that age with me (meaning them come onto me). I have no game and am married with kids.
I guess? It's a cultural norm, ultimately. Biologically, there's a reason reason why men are fertile their entire lives. Isn't it curious that girls typically begin puberty before boys the same age. From an evolutionary standpoint, an older more established male equals security, protection, and a greater chance to provide for her and her offspring. On the opposite side, youth is hardwired in the male human brain as a sign of virility, and the fertility to be able to successfully bare children, which even just 100 years ago child and mother mortality were extremely high.
There's simply a fine line between liking younger women and being a sexual deviant. Part of that determination is purely sociological, and scores of previous civilizations wouldn't frown upon such behavior - including the Romans, our historical starting point for what has become modern Western Civilization. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth:
I guess? It's a cultural norm, ultimately. Biologically, there's a reason reason why men are fertile their entire lives. Isn't it curious that girls typically begin puberty before boys the same age. From an evolutionary standpoint, an older more established male equals security, protection, and a greater chance to provide for her and her offspring. On the opposite side, youth is hardwired in the male human brain as a sign of virility, and the fertility to be able to successfully bare children, which even just 100 years ago child and mother mortality were extremely high.
There's simply a fine line between liking younger women and being a sexual deviant. Part of that determination is purely sociological, and scores of previous civilizations wouldn't frown upon such behavior - including the Romans, our historical starting point for what has become modern Western Civilization.
That and young males were expendable when it comes to war/hunting. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
Students who did not participate in any sexual activity or receive nude photos may need therapy to recover from the trauma of learning about it, he said.
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
And, on the flipside of this topic... a 30 year old male PE teacher in Plano, TX was just arrested for 'relations' with a 16 year old girl.
Obligatory
Sexism double standard. Hang him.
post
To be fair, age of consent for some states is 16. Most people are sexually active by 16- and a TON more that aren't wish they were.
The problem lies in his position as a trusted mentor and educator. High school isn't or shouldn't be teachers personal singles bar.
You're entrusted with a job and responsibility, and sex ed tutoring outside class isn't part of the job description. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RINGLEADER:
Can someone please post a rogues gallery of all the teachers that have been caught in this thread. Would be interested in seeing if the trend is up or down.
I think it's about time for a hot or not website of teachers who have boned their students. [Reply]
