- Ranked 2nd among charted prospects in success rate vs. man (75%) and press coverage (75.7%) - Led all prospects in success rate vs. zone coverage (88.1%) - He can play inside and outsidehttps://t.co/HbifB61JlJpic.twitter.com/HYsV8rlAzF
Looked good enough getting positive yardage on punt returns, though he does not appear to be very fast. I don't watch college ball and don't care to look at highlights- is he not much of a burner?
He seems like he's got a solid build but I'd expect a small guy like him to be faster. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Looked good enough getting positive yardage on punt returns, though he does not appear to be very fast. I don't watch college ball and don't care to look at highlights- is he not much of a burner?
He seems like he's got a solid build but I'd expect a small guy like him to be faster.
442 40 if I remember correctly-plenty fast enough [Reply]
Originally Posted by GloucesterChief:
Lots of WRs have made long careers not by being the fastest but by being always open due to route running and quickness.
If Moore's floor is say Renfrow, that is still an excellent pick in the 2nd round.
But this is where people have it wrong. He can absolutely win deep too, he's just usually not going to have more than a step on his defender. You only need one though.
His 40 is good, not great, but his 10 yard split is fantastic. [Reply]
He's as fast as Damien Williams was when he won a SB with the Chiefs. As fast as Sammy was when he was here.
He looked pretty good in person, at least to me. Showed all the skills to be a starting WR, and some nice running ability after the catch. Guy is going to be a star for this team by the end of the season. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
On a related note, how did everyone's favorite receiver George Pickens look? I honestly didn't notice him in the Steelers game.
Pickens only had a couple of targets that I saw. Their offense is pretty bad right now but even with Trubisky at QB, they seemed to be intent on getting the ball to Claypool and Johnson. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Pickens only had a couple of targets that I saw. Their offense is pretty bad right now but even with Trubisky at QB, they seemed to be intent on getting the ball to Claypool and Johnson.
I’m not one to scream and yell about the OC, but I’m genuinely confused why the Steelers stand by Matt Canada.
Yeah, Ben was bad last year, and they had a bottom of the league OL, but they sure didn’t do those guys any favors. Usually lines and RBs eventually improve at running the ball, and the Steelers seemed to get WORSE at it [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
On a related note, how did everyone's favorite receiver George Pickens look? I honestly didn't notice him in the Steelers game.
I bet George Pickens woulda caught those deep passes that Hardman missed....just sayin'. [Reply]