Originally Posted by comochiefsfan:
I just want to know who thought it was a good idea to put a stipulation in his contract that gave him full authority to call plays.
Originally Posted by Fish:
Yeah, that's a pretty cheap excuse to start off the story. If this were really true, and could be confirmed, this would be one of the most reported on stories for months.
I don't doubt there might be quite a bit of truth here. But there's certainly a lot of loose accusations.
The whole thing reads like a social experiment on how you can put a bunch of words together and give the weakest reasoning possible, wrap it up with a terrible "oh, but he could be rehired", and still get clicks and retweets and things.
Not that we needed another article like that to know it's true, but it's all I can come up with.
Remove about 80% of the article and come up with a story where EB wanted more play calling responsibilities this season, fucked it up, and it caused a rift... and it would be far more believable on its own, minus all the bullshit fluff and tryhardedness. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle: :-) 90% of the comments shitting on it.
Given how much the average reddit poster has their head firmly lodged within their own ass, that isn't the indictment on GoChiefs you think it is. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower:
Given how much the average reddit poster has their head firmly lodged within their own ass, that isn't the indictment on GoChiefs you think it is.
The Chiefs sub is awful... the gif wars are amazing, but the football takes are far worse on any average day than CP is after a loss. [Reply]