Amazon isn't an Over-The-Air Free TV network, it's $12.99 per month or $119.00 per year.
This is a ploy on their part to make viewers pay for at least 2 months of Amazon Prime to see the show in "Real Time".
And I'd cancel HBO Max if I was paying more than the $7.50 a month rate I'm getting through Spectrum because it's a shit streamer that offers far less relevant content than either Starz or Showtime, both of which cost $7.50 per month combined.
I’m paying $99 a year for Amazon Prime shipping. I’d pay 4X-5X that a year if Prime didn’t exist. The TV Prime ain’t worth $119 a year as a stand alone product. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mahomes_Is_God:
Aya Cash is hawt as fawk
She's always had a bit of a 'lazy' paunch to her that keeps her from being truly hot.
It showed up a season or two into "You're the Worst" - just that typical party girl gut that's not a deal-breaker but keeps her from being a legit smokeshow.
At that point she just looks like a 100 girls you see on your average college campus. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
She's always had a bit of a 'lazy' paunch to her that keeps her from being truly hot.
It showed up a season or two into "You're the Worst" - just that typical party girl gut that's not a deal-breaker but keeps her from being a legit smokeshow.
At that point she just looks like a 100 girls you see on your average college campus.
For me, there are [at least] two VERY distinct types of hot.
There's hot that erects your genitals, and there's hot that melts your heart.
The former is purely visual, could even just be a part. Boobs, legs, eyes, feet, etc.
Your Gal Godot, prime Pamela Anderson, etc.
The latter is where you can picture yourself holding her purse while she shops and not even minding.
Jenna Fischer is the prototype. Jenny Slate is another. Aya is that kind of hot. 'put up with their moods and nod 'yes honey' hot.' [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
That's pretty damn good considering college age girls range anywhere from 18-22 years old while Aya Cash is 38.
She also makes a living in part on her appearance and has never had kids.
So it's a bit of a wash here. but ultimately if we're gonna say "hot for 38" I'll consider the argument, but the blanket 'hot' statement doesn't allow for a grading curve. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
She also makes a living in part on her appearance and has never had kids.
So it's a bit of a wash here. but ultimately if we're gonna say "hot for 38" I'll consider the argument, but the blanket 'hot' statement doesn't allow for a grading curve.
I'd only say "Hot for 38" when compared to average college girls, most of whom won't look anything like Aya Cash 20 years down the road. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
I'd only say "Hot for 38" when compared to average college girls, most of whom won't look anything like Aya Cash 20 years down the road.
No question.
Living in a college town has really driven home for me how difficult it is for women to be unattractive at 21 years old.
