Originally Posted by :
A 28-year-old Lake Charles-area woman faces a bevy of charges after Louisiana police said she repeatedly had sex with a 13-year-old boy who she met at the Bible camp where she was a teacher/aide.
According to the Sulphur Daily News, Heather Daughdrill initiated the relationship in June and it continued until a complaint was filed in October. After her arrest on November 29, police told the paper that Daughdrill would pick her victim up from school without his parents' knowledge and subject him to sexual encounters. Louisiana cops also reportedly found sexually explicit texts between Daughdrill and her victim.
Originally Posted by Pants:
Yeah, 8th grade. I was one horny little mother****er in 8th grade and would have given my left nut to bang a hot teacher.
this. I was a walking hard on in 8th grade who fantasized about older women. this kid was living my fantasy. I would have rode this woman for hours and hours and hours. She'd be bow legged after a few days with me. I'd be so damn happy I'd have followed her around like a kitten follows a leaky cow... [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcxiv:
honest question, would you be mentally damaged if the 13 year old was you? I highly highly highly doubt it. I am not saying its not wrong on her part, it is, but from the kids point of view?
Kid's gonna be bragging about this for years [Reply]
Originally Posted by SPchief:
How is this different than a 13 year old boy blowing Jerry Sandusky in shower?
because one is sexual assualt/rape and the other is a kid with a hard on loving every stinking minute this hot naked teacher is blowing him and telling him to insert his unit into her tight wet hole...
wow, if you don't see the difference I feel sorry for you bro... one is clearly consensual, albiet with an underage kid and one is forced sex by a pedafile homo. Sandusky needs to be locked away in a prison where his fellow inmates will happily give him a taste of his own medicine.
This woman will be ostricized by society but she didn't rape the kid, trust me. That kid got a heavy dose of strange and will forever remember the good times he had with the hot teacher when his friends were all jacking off to their mother's victoria secret catalog... [Reply]
I would be all over that when I was 13, I'd pump that like Thumper putting it to bunnies on Easter.... since it was bible school the correlation is fitting. [Reply]
Originally Posted by saphojunkie:
Still, one fact cannot be argued - there is an intense sexual double standard. If this were a 35 year old guy...shit, if this were a 25 year old guy and a 13 year old girl, there'd be pitchforks in the street, instead of a bunch of jealous dads.
Of course there's a double standard. As there should be. Throughout human history, men have been stronger and larger than women. Thus, men have been the rapers. I don't think anyone's kept count but, if you add up the rapes in history, I think it's probably "men, 8 billion, women, 32". A male can force himself on an unwilling female, but it's pretty hard to force a male. It's a different anatomy; we have to be aroused in order to complete the act. And this isn't even taking into account the sociological development of males vs. females; males are tought from an early age to conquer, and to desire "getting laid" above all else, whereas females are given baby dolls and taught to dream about their wedding day. Even in late teens and beyond, men who get laid are "studs" while women who get laid are "sluts". 90% of boys spent their pubescent years dreaming about fucking women (preferably older ones); I'm pretty sure 90% of girls don't spend their pubescent years dreaming about fucking men (although the number's probably higher than men think).
The difference today is, back in the day, if a kid got boinked by a female teacher, it didn't get reported. He wasn't considered a "victim", he was considered a lucky sonofabitch. Nowadays, with all the touchy-feely and politically-correct crap, we have to ruin it for the poor kids and make them feel guilty about it. Just let the lucky little buggers enjoy themselves! [Reply]
Originally Posted by saphojunkie:
Still, one fact cannot be argued - there is an intense sexual double standard.
Yes, there absolutely is a double standard. The notions of Political Correctness, Women's Liberation and gender equality have had a lot of ground to make up for centuries of horribly abusive behavior towards women. It seems to me that all of that effort was bent towards convincing society that women should be treated with respect because they are equal to men. I understand why it was done and I see why it was necessary. I just think that sometimes the point is lost that males and females are not the same. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
A 28-year-old Lake Charles-area woman faces a bevy of charges after Louisiana police said she repeatedly had sex with a 13-year-old boy who she met at the Bible camp where she was a teacher/aide.
bible camp and then sex with a kid? seriously? [Reply]
It's neat reading the double standards in this thread and then when it's convenient the same people act like they don't exist in all facets of life. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ:
because one is sexual assualt/rape and the other is a kid with a hard on loving every stinking minute this hot naked teacher is blowing him and telling him to insert his unit into her tight wet hole...
wow, if you don't see the difference I feel sorry for you bro... one is clearly consensual, albiet with an underage kid and one is forced sex by a pedafile homo. Sandusky needs to be locked away in a prison where his fellow inmates will happily give him a taste of his own medicine.
This woman will be ostricized by society but she didn't rape the kid, trust me. That kid got a heavy dose of strange and will forever remember the good times he had with the hot teacher when his friends were all jacking off to their mother's victoria secret catalog...
You can't rape the willing and he was willing. Sandusky will meet the 400 pound man soon enough. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Otter:
It's neat reading the double standards in this thread and then when it's convenient the same people act like they don't exist in all facets of life.
Totally true, divorce court, traffic tickets, jobs, the list goes on and on and on. [Reply]
Regardless if the 13 year old boy actually liked it, an adult in a position of authority has zero business touching the business end of a youth, let alone one over which they have authority.
By the law, this lady is no better than Sandusky or a pedo priest.
If the kid was 17, I'd feel different about it than I do at 13. At age 13, she molested that boy. [Reply]
i have no problem with it.
if the kid was my son i would rather he did it with a hot teacher rather than hanging out at porn sites on the internet and masturbating. [Reply]
