I'm constructing the framework for an argument using prison as an analogy. It was tongue in cheek, but I'm not surprised that went over your head, given that the extent of your reading comes on a white board that gives the day's specials.
[Reply]

Did he? Do you have a link?
[Reply]

More baseless accusations. I'll continue to hope something awful, and I mean awful happens to the shack you are so proud you have paid off.
[Reply]

Well, that wasn't me, so I can't speak to that. I wouldn't have banned Floppy either. In fact, I think I unbanned him from that one.
[Reply]

the way Dane conducted himself on this board the past year makes him one of the most pathetic people I've ever came across in my life...

I have no doubt in my mind that he's an intelligent, successful (money wise) guy. None.

However, he's very insecure. Very, very insecure.

I can promise everyone on this board that, if I ever find great success you'll never see me act the way he does. It's ridiculous. From crying about Buster Hymen threatening to beat him up, to R8ers calling him a pedophile...the man has some serious issues, and his conduct on this board makes that quite clear.

It's not even an act...it's just Dane. Riddled with insecurities.
[Reply]

yup gimme a min to look it up
[Reply]

Is she hot?
[Reply]

we don't have specials where I work, so I don't even get that :-)
[Reply]

This message board has always been the wild west. Everyone's line as far as what is acceptable and what isn't is different. But community-wide the following seem to be acceptable:

1. assigning an untrue sexual orientation
2. indicating that someone would have sexual relations with their own mother or other family member
3. indicating that someone would have sexual relations with a different species
4. indicating that someone would have sexual relations with a dead person

Calling someone a pedophile is a worse than the above, but not greatly so.

In general, the insults of the types listed below do not materially damage the reputation of the person at which they are thrown because they are recognized as insults.

In a just system, rules are applied uniformly regardless of the popularity of the conflicted parties.

Dane is a good poster, and I will miss his contributions. But I don't think the mods acted incorrectly, given the community standards of this board.
[Reply]

Not even on beer?
[Reply]

R8ers has the reading comprehension skills of a 2nd grader. The fact he even registered for this site is a god damn miracle. I don't remember that's how it went down AT fucking all.

R8ers should be banned for his bullshit.
[Reply]

Best wishes Dane-hope the paths you chose lead to success in this journey called life.

Take care bud!
[Reply]

Yeah, I tend to lean that way. Like I said, I agree that it's probably borderline, and I'd probably have done something about it had it gone on for more than a few pages of a thread. However, it's not like he was saying "I have a picture in my possession of Dane butt fucking a little kid" or anything. No one seriously thought Dane was a pedophile.

No arguments.
[Reply]

And there was overwhelming support from the community that said he shouldn't have been banned for such comment.
[Reply]

You can't call someone a necrophiliac?
[Reply]