Chiefs are trading six-time Pro-Bowl WR Tyreek Hill to the Miami Dolphins for five draft picks: a 2022 1st-round pick (No. 29), a 2nd-round pick (No. 50) and a 4th-round pick, as well as 4th- and 6th-round picks in the 2023 draft, sources tell ESPN.
Originally Posted by -King-:
I also don't understand pushing part of Frank Clark's dead money into next year if your whole goal is to save money for the future. All these moves make no sense in combination with each other.
The Chiefs gave up high picks for Frank Clark and used money on FA’s like Sammy and Tyrann. They won a SB and then got to another. That window is done.
They had no choice but to trade a 1st for a solid LT bc they were forced too due to injury.
The Chiefs have A LOT of needs whether Tyreek stayed or left. Look at this team dude. Who is worse than us at DE and corner? It had to be done.
Now they have a lot of picks in a draft that’s deep at edge, receiver and corner. All those players are cheap. And they can now have money to be active in FA. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Should’ve known this was all about Mahomes and Alex for you.
JFC man get over it.
Do people have absolutely no capacity to read plain English?
Absolutely retarded response.
The point was about htis' allegations of 'levels of vitriol.'
I responded I was fan-positive throughout and not vitriolic to the naysayers, while the same can't be said of flip-side, who hated optimism when they weren't optimistic, and hated any criticism when they were optimistic. [Reply]
Originally Posted by jd1020:
Calling someone greedy for wanting more money is the dumbest ****ing thing imaginable. We all want more money.
No it’s not the dumbest thing imaginable. If that’s the case then Mahomes needs to get out his contract now and find someone who will pay him 600 million. At a certain point the quest for money ends unless you’re trying to buy property on the moon.
This is a forum about football. And winning games. Tyreek took more money when he’s already filthy and abundantly rich over winning more. That’s the bottom line. I personally call that greedy because he doesn’t really NEED the money and is insanely rich already and would continue to be so. (Unless his choices are that poor)
In fact I could argue winning more is better in the long term. More wins equals even more commercials endorsements and deals [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
At the end of the day, winning makes guys hungry for money, we need to shed some of these fat highly paid hogs off this team.
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
If we win the super bowl next year let alone a stacked AFC West Veach deserves a guaranteed contract for life
Chiefs won't win the West next season. Too much ground lost. Everyone else got better, KC got worse. Too much ground lost.They'll have to find a new ways to win.. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Fishels:
No it’s not the dumbest thing imaginable. If that’s the case then Mahomes needs to get out his contract now and find someone who will pay him 600 million. At a certain point the quest for money ends unless you’re trying to buy property on the moon.
This is forum about football. And winning games. Tyreek took more money when he’s already filthy and abundantly rich over winning more. That’s the bottom line. I personally call that greedy because he doesn’t really NEED the money and is insanely rich already and would continue to be so.
By NFL standards for what the Chiefs got from Tyreek, they paid him peanuts. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dirk digler:
Would you rather have Hill or have Ronald Jones, Clowney and Marquez Valdes-Scantling?
Better list:
Hill or
Jadeveon Clowney, Kyzir White, James Bradberry, (and maybe a WR, too) in free agency +
A badass DE (Sam Williams) and a badass DT (Travis Jones or Devonte Wyatt) [Reply]