Have not liked Russini since she gauranteed that we were getting a 1st for Sneed.
This sounds stupid. Why would you have him test anything on the field? You’ll know exactly where you stand after the scope is done on Monday. Good grief.
What will the Chiefs do at WR? Rashee Rice is on IR and his knee is still swollen. The next step for the receiver will be to test it on the field once the swelling goes down and he will get his knee scoped. Here’s more�������� pic.twitter.com/dk2VpBmNDC
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I’m just operating under the assumption that he isn’t coming back this year, and if that is the case then hell yes suspend him ASAP, post surgery.
But that means Bart Vatch has to be working the lines in the coming weeks. We need some talent and depth.
He would have been ruled out already via the MRI and second opinions if things were that bad. Plus he wouldn't be walking around locker rooms infront of media guys either. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
He would have been ruled out already via the MRI and second opinions if things were that bad. Plus he wouldn't be walking around locker rooms infront of media guys either.
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Have not liked Russini since she gauranteed that we were getting a 1st for Sneed.
This sounds stupid. Why would you have him test anything on the field? You’ll know exactly where you stand after the scope is done on Monday. Good grief.
What will the Chiefs do at WR? Rashee Rice is on IR and his knee is still swollen. The next step for the receiver will be to test it on the field once the swelling goes down and he will get his knee scoped. Here’s more�������� pic.twitter.com/dk2VpBmNDC
Originally Posted by penguinz:
JfcC your are a god damned idiot.
Don't know the difference between a partial tear or a detached ligament.
A partial tear is torn. Just not all the way through. Has nothing to do with detachment.
I'm admittedly not a medical profession, but unless every medical website is wrong, then you are way off base. It has been established in this thread many times that "tear" in this context is not the same as the layman's definition and that "partial tear" refers to a severe stretching. For example:
"Injured ligaments are considered sprains and are graded on a severity scale.
Grade 1 Sprains. The ligament is mildly damaged in a Grade 1 sprain. It has been slightly stretched but is still able to help keep the knee joint stable.
Grade 2 Sprains. A Grade 2 sprain stretches the ligament to the point where it becomes loose. This is often referred to as a partial tear of the ligament.
Grade 3 Sprains. This type of sprain is most commonly referred to as a complete tear of the ligament. The ligament has been torn in half or pulled directly off the bone, and the knee joint is unstable.
Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament are rare; most ACL injuries are complete or near complete tears."
Originally Posted by Rainbarrel:
Collinsworth-Florio-Bayless hen party conclusion
It actually makes a lot of sense. I believe the criminal case is scheduled for sometime in June and he's taking an L on that one way or another. Well if he's going to have to miss near a year anyway it would make sense to speed up the legal process. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
He would have been ruled out already via the MRI and second opinions if things were that bad. Plus he wouldn't be walking around locker rooms infront of media guys either.
Couple years ago Von Miller went through this very same thing and had the same scope that found out he tore his ACL. In fact he’s from Texas and I’m pretty sure he went to Dallas for the scope. Might be the same Dr Rashee is going to [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Couple years ago Von Miller went through this very same thing and had the same scope that found out he tore his ACL. In fact he’s from Texas and I’m pretty sure he went to Dallas for the scope. Might be the same Dr Rashee is going to
With Vonn they were saying it was a partial ACL at first and he said he would need a brace but wanted to play. But with Rashee reports are saying it could be PCL, MCL, LCL. It's not just an ACL thing. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Diana's after the fact yeah, but she does have a spotty history. Sweeney's doesn't really say anything more than Breer's.
Sweeney said it before Albert and said his source said they will be looking to see IF there is any damage to the pcl, mcl and lcl. So why not believe him? And Diana is no different to Albert imo. The fact that her source said he will test the knee on a field suggests the mri and second opinion came back clean. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Third Eye:
I'm admittedly not a medical profession, but unless every medical website is wrong, then you are way off base. It has been established in this thread many times that "tear" in this context is not the same as the layman's definition and that "partial tear" refers to a severe stretching. For example:
"Injured ligaments are considered sprains and are graded on a severity scale.
Grade 1 Sprains. The ligament is mildly damaged in a Grade 1 sprain. It has been slightly stretched but is still able to help keep the knee joint stable.
Grade 2 Sprains. A Grade 2 sprain stretches the ligament to the point where it becomes loose. This is often referred to as a partial tear of the ligament.
Grade 3 Sprains. This type of sprain is most commonly referred to as a complete tear of the ligament. The ligament has been torn in half or pulled directly off the bone, and the knee joint is unstable.
Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament are rare; most ACL injuries are complete or near complete tears."
I've literally had two partially torn ligaments, about a 40% tear, in my ankle.
You and what's his nuts keep narrowing down to just the acl. If you want to only consider that you both are correct. Acls almost always are full tears and mris are virtually flawless looking for single tears in the knee.
When possiblity of multiple ligament tears in the knee the results are much less accurate.
They are clearly worried about damage to multiple tissues which is why they aren't relying on the initial mris and waiting for swelling to go down. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bearcat:
Is there money to be made by guessing this shit?
Maybe I should start a tweeter and stamp it with "over 30 years of IT experience".... and whenever there's a data breach, just use definitive-sounding bullshit..... "all the evidence suggests this was a ransomware attack and that these attackers will want money. One thing I'm being told is the attackers might not follow through in this case if they're paid."
Now give me a follow and $20.
Hell, would people bet on that? Set the over/under on a data breach at $x million with a parlay on whether they pay and whether the attackers follow through... high stakes shit right there.
It is 2024, facts no longer matter. Everyone has a platform and people believe what they want to believe based on feelings and emotions. Truly a fascinating time to be alive! [Reply]
Originally Posted by penguinz:
I've literally had two partially torn ligaments, about a 40% tear, in my ankle.
You and what's his nuts keep narrowing down to just the acl. If you want to only consider that you both are correct. Acls almost always are full tears and mris are virtually flawless looking for single tears in the knee.
When possiblity of multiple ligament tears in the knee the results are much less accurate.
They are clearly worried about damage to multiple tissues which is why they aren't relying on the initial mris and waiting for swelling to go down.
Your posts on the subject are moving the goalposts now. Just an absolute refusal to accept what people smarter than you are saying and always needing to have the last word. [Reply]