Makes me wonder if this offense was going to be much of anything even if Rashee and Hollywood didn't get injured. Pass happy offense can't operate at full potential if the QB has to get the ball out in 2 seconds or less.
I love Veach, truly, but his gamble last year on the WR room and his gamble this year at LT have both failed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Not sure what everyone saw from Kingsley that makes them think he could play OG. His number one asset is his feet. He's built for space. If he's not a tackle going forward, he probably doesn't have a spot. He's just not built to play inside. Wanya, on the other hand...
The ideal outcome is Humphries holds LT down for 2-3 years, which allows Kingsley a chance to polish up and step back in when DJ is gone [Reply]
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
The ideal outcome is Humphries holds LT down for 2-3 years, which allows Kingsley a chance to polish up and step back in when DJ is gone
I like Kingsley but he is a project player at this point.
We need to add another guy who has a chance in the draft. [Reply]
What are we doing here? Stroud had all day and was late on the throw. Chalking that up to being sped up makes no sense just like when Mahomes has missed passes from clean pockets. [Reply]
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
I like Kingsley but he is a project player at this point.
We need to add another guy who has a chance in the draft.
I dunno man, kinda torn on using more draft capital
Kinda all depends on Humphries, if he isn't a 2-3 year answer then I'm down for drafting another guy but man its such a high bust rate at that position
Thats why I'm such a fan of snapping up proven vet free agents at that position in particular... even getting someone who isn't great, but at least steady, is a win [Reply]
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
I dunno man, kinda torn on using more draft capital
Kinda all depends on Humphries, if he isn't a 2-3 year answer then I'm down for drafting another guy but man its such a high bust rate at that position
Thats why I'm such a fan of snapping up proven vet free agents at that position in particular... even getting someone who isn't great, but at least steady, is a win
I come down in this camp. I get why Veach tried because the value and how it lets you build a team is so great but even if we had a vet LT that gave up a couple sacks a game but allowed Mahomes to not have to scramble the moment he got the ball would be a huge win right now. With a proven vet you’re hoping for better than that but right now it’s just an open door to the QB so frequently it would be a huge upgrade. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RINGLEADER:
I come down in this camp. I get why Veach tried because the value and how it lets you build a team is so great but even if we had a vet LT that gave up a couple sacks a game but allowed Mahomes to not have to scramble the moment he got the ball would be a huge win right now. With a proven vet you’re hoping for better than that but right now it’s just an open door to the QB so frequently it would be a huge upgrade.
Its a position that really just begs for a solid floor, and proven vets give you that solid floor
You don't have to be the lovechild of Willie Roaf and Orlando Pace, just be consistent and stable... no big highs, but no big lows either
I'm just hoping like hell Humphries plays as good as he looks and sounds [Reply]