Teicher on the radio saying this could be an interesting game and suggests that the chiefs could look past this game and it could be a trap game [Reply]
Originally Posted by louie aguiar:
Teicher on the radio saying this could be an interesting game and suggests that the chiefs could look past this game and it could be a trap game
Originally Posted by louie aguiar:
Teicher on the radio saying this could be an interesting game and suggests that the chiefs could look past this game and it could be a trap game
Teicher has made a 30 year career out of stating the obvious. [Reply]
Is it possible the Chiefs are purposely trying to keep Hopkins snaps below the 60% threshold? It doesn't make sense to me for Hopkins to play 47% of the snaps in a game of that magnitude. He was 3rd in the WR room in snaps.
Originally Posted by golfindude:
The pressure of being undefeated , expecting to win every week is a heavy load that is visibly wearing on our Chiefs. ,. Plus opponents are always up for this game. Your selling the panthers short if you think they can't win. Chiefs will need a good effort and specifically a good start..
No, the pressure of one of the best teams in the NFL and one of the best QBs in the NFL was a heavy load.
Jeez man, lose one game...ONE GAME to an elite opponent and people start saying dumbass stuff [Reply]
Is it possible the Chiefs are purposely trying to keep Hopkins snaps below the 60% threshold? It doesn't make sense to me for Hopkins to play 47% of the snaps in a game of that magnitude. He was 3rd in the WR room in snaps.
— Carrington Harrison (@cdotharrison) November 18, 2024
Is it possible the Chiefs are purposely trying to keep Hopkins snaps below the 60% threshold? It doesn't make sense to me for Hopkins to play 47% of the snaps in a game of that magnitude. He was 3rd in the WR room in snaps.
I was wondering about that myself, though I wasn't aware of the exact percentage. 47% seems awfully low.
I was pretty annoyed during last night's game in the first series of the 3rd quarter, when it was 3rd-and-1, and both Travis and DHop were on the sidelines though. It was like we were shouting to BUF and the world, "hey, we're running it here!!!!" Didn't make any sense to me at all.
And I know there were a few other plays where DHop was conspicuously not on the field in key 3rd down moments during the game that seemed odd to me.
I suppose it's possible that he hasn't absorbed enough of the playbook/subpackages yet. Heck, it's only been 3.5 weeks since he became a Chief? [Reply]
Is it possible the Chiefs are purposely trying to keep Hopkins snaps below the 60% threshold? It doesn't make sense to me for Hopkins to play 47% of the snaps in a game of that magnitude. He was 3rd in the WR room in snaps.
I listened to his segment on this today. He was basically alluding to, as some have here, that the Chiefs may not have been going all out to win this game. He used this Hopkins stat and the fact that Josh Uche played 5 total snaps in a game where we got very little pressure on Allen. [Reply]