Originally Posted by TheGuardian:
MRI's ARE 100% accurate it's the READING of the person looking at the MRI, you f'n dope.
Also for the people saying or even quoting a doctor saying the swelling interferes with the MRI that is BULLSHIT.
It actually gives contrast to the ligaments, swelling doesn't do shit to interfere with it.
It is WILD to me as a dude that has to look at this shit that there's supposed doctors on Twitter talking about it as clueless as they are.
Swelling and edema and non-contractile elements are seen on the MRI as such. They do not interfere with looking at the muscle, the architecture of it or the tendons and ligaments.
**** I can't read that dumb shit one more time.
Your and idiot.
Originally Posted by :
Results
For detecting the specific injured structures in MLKIs, MRI had high sensitivity (90.7% for ACL, 90.4% for PCL, and moderate specificity (63.6% for ACL, 50% for PCL) in detecting cruciate ligament injuries, moderate sensitivity (79.1% for MCL, 55.6% for LCL) and specificity (46.7% for MCL, 68.4% for LCL) in detecting collateral ligament injuries, fair sensitivity (61.5%) and low specificity (39.4%) in the diagnosis of injuries to the meniscus. For classifying the MIKIs, MRI had a moderate agreement with intraoperative findings in classifying KD-V (kappa value = 0.57), poor agreement in the KD-I (kappa value = 0.39) and KD-IIIM (kappa value = 0.31), meaningless in the KD-II and KD-IIIL (kappa value < 0). The overall agreement between MRI and intraoperative findings in classifying MLKIs was poor (kappa value = 0.23).
Conclusions
MRI is valuable in early detection and diagnosis of acute MLKIs, however, the accuracy of MRI in classifying MLKIs is limited. The management of MLKIs should be based on intraoperative findings, physical examinations, and comprehensive imaging results.
Originally Posted by In58men:
Is it out 4 games or 4 weeks because we have a bye next week?
Pretty sure it is 4 games.
From 2022:
"Players designated for return from the reserve/injured or reserve/non-football injury/illness list are eligible to come back after "four games have elapsed since the date he was placed on the applicable reserve list," per the memo obtained by Garafolo."
But hell, this team loves to slow play their injuries during the RS and even IF he could come back in 4 weeks, they will probably take 6-8 to throw him back out there. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
yip it's games
But hell, this team loves to slow play their injuries during the RS and even IF he could come back in 4 weeks, they will probably take 6-8 to throw him back out there.
If he comes back at all this year and plays well, then it’s a huge win [Reply]
Just looking at the IR rules for the NFL and learned that apparently starting in 2024, even if you are on the "season ending" IR list, you are eligible to come back for the playoffs.
Should we read it as significant good news that the Chiefs are putting him on the 4 week IR list? Isn't there a limited number of spots they can use for that? Thought it was a kind of low number, but not finding anything about it online. Might be a rule that changed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by wazu:
Just looking at the IR rules for the NFL and learned that apparently starting in 2024, even if you are on the "season ending" IR list, you are eligible to come back for the playoffs.
Should we read it as significant good news that the Chiefs are putting him on the 4 week IR list? Isn't there a limited number of spots they can use for that? Thought it was a kind of low number, but not finding anything about it online. Might be a rule that changed.