Originally Posted by philfree:
45–48-year-old George Foreman was much more impressive than 58 year old Tyson or 27-year-old Paul.
I remember that one. Toward the end Foreman was exhausted and could barely swing, but the other guy couldn't knock him down because it was like he was punching a tree. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Ack, I did that 10-15 years ago, I guess. Terrible mistake.
I saw her on stage back in the early 90s. Even though she's pretty much the exact opposite of my preferred type (brunette, brown eyes, big boobs), I can say without reservation that she was the sexiest woman I've ever seen with my own eyes, by a factor. I have an autographed polaroid somewhere of me holding her in my arms after the show. Big ol' stupid grin on my face, too. :-)
Originally Posted by 4th and Long:
These guys are sitting together in the locker room, having a few beers, laughing their asses off and discussing how they're going to spend their money.
Agreed. Pretty nice cash grab. Good for them. Hopefully Iron Mike is a lot more careful with his money this time after burning so much cash in his earlier years. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
The worst part of this is some reerun is probably going to bump the most reeruned thread in CP history and try to pretend this is proof that Bruce Lee would beat prime Mike Tyson.
I don’t care. Was still an exciting excuse to get hyped about boxing again. It was always going to be about the first 2 rounds and if Tyson could exploit something. Although I would love to have seen Tyson whoop him, I also kind of wished paul showed less restraint and just went after Tyson because a KO from either side would have made the fight more interesting.
The undercards, especially the Serrano fight despite the outcome, were spectacular and made it worth it. Could have done without the commentators aside from jones [Reply]