Originally Posted by tredadda:
Irrelevant. They both started the same time and competed against each other twice a year. Team finances don’t matter. Just because you want to adjust the timeline to fit your narrative doesn’t change that.
When one KNOWS they're wrong, that's what they do. Every time. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
When one KNOWS they're wrong, that's what they do. Every time.
It's the same crap some of them do when they claim on the one hand that Denver never cheated and it's ok because they got away with it, then on the other hand they whine about how unfair it is that the Chiefs get all the calls. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Oh good lord ... I don't give a crap! My opinion is my opinion and that's that. We did not compete on the same level those years, not even close. That should be obvious to any reasonably well-informed fan.
And ... accepted here? Yeah right.
You DO understand this argument is like a Royals fan claiming that losses to the Yankees don’t count…right?
(Actually much worse)
No one above 12 would make this argument. Except, apparently, Mensas.
Apparently the situation suddenly became “fair” immediately after KC’s first SB win? :-) [Reply]
I just don’t understand debating the full history… it is what it is. I became a fan of Denver in 1984, Elway’s second season when I was 13 and Broncos games were primarily the late game. I don’t have the desire nor the energy to debate anything prior.
Literally when I became a Chiefs fan.
Valley girls weren’t allowed to root for the Raiders (gang gang)
Or the Chargers (fuck San Diego)
And Elway was a big giant cheater.
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
I just don’t understand debating the full history… it is what it is. I became a fan of Denver in 1984, Elway’s second season when I was 13 and Broncos games were primarily the late game. I don’t have the desire nor the energy to debate anything prior.
But good luck to those that do.
Yeah, all-time records just are what they are. There's not much sense in trying to argue about them by somehow altering them. It's just dishonest. That idiot just couldn't admit that he was dishonest in his approach. [Reply]
