Originally Posted by RunKC:
Ja’Quan McMillian is a really good slot corner for you guys. He’s a FA after this year. Gonna be hard to replace that unless you pay him.
We saw what happened to your defense when you guys had even one vulnerable corner
Yep, we have 3 good corners, which is pretty much the minimum today. McMillian isn’t exactly a household name, so hopefully he won’t be prohibitively expensive. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Wouldn't it be great if the Broncos and Chiefs played each other in back-to-back weeks?
It's actually possible ... wouldn't that be great?
Wrong. Chiefs are getting the bye, fartsucker.
And even if they don't, the Broncos are playing the Chiefs backups in Week 18. It's basically an entirely different team that they'd be facing the following week in the playoffs. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
Wrong. Chiefs are getting the bye, fartsucker.
And even if they don't, the Broncos are playing the Chiefs backups in Week 18. It's basically an entirely different team that they'd be facing the following week in the playoffs.
Is it, though? It seems like the Chieves haven't played a really good game in weeks, except possibly against Buffalo.
I think the Chieves need to buckle down and stop eking out these wins against mediocre opponents. Otherwise, this seems to be setting up for a hungry Buffalo or Ratbird team to win decisively in the playoffs.
To be clear, I definitely think the Chieves can do it. But they need to start clicking pretty soon. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Is it, though? It seems like the Chieves haven't played a really good game in weeks, except possibly against Buffalo.
I think the Chieves need to buckle down and stop eking out these wins against mediocre opponents. Otherwise, this seems to be setting up for a hungry Buffalo or Ratbird team to win decisively in the playoffs.
To ne clear, I definitely think the Chieves can do it. But the need to start clicking pretty soon.
Did you really just ask if KC's starters are different from their backups? :-):-):-)
This might be an all-timer.
And are you calling LAC a mediocre opponent? They're a playoff team that led the Broncos 23-0 in Mile High before going prevent. Denver's offense did zilch until garbage time against a team with half its secondary out, and several more key players that went down during the course of the game. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Is it, though? It seems like the Chieves haven't played a really good game in weeks, except possibly against Buffalo.
I think the Chieves need to buckle down and stop eking out these wins against mediocre opponents. Otherwise, this seems to be setting up for a hungry Buffalo or Ratbird team to win decisively in the playoffs.
To be clear, I definitely think the Chieves can do it. But they need to start clicking pretty soon.
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Is it, though? It seems like the Chieves haven't played a really good game in weeks, except possibly against Buffalo.
I think the Chieves need to buckle down and stop eking out these wins against mediocre opponents. Otherwise, this seems to be setting up for a hungry Buffalo or Ratbird team to win decisively in the playoffs.
To be clear, I definitely think the Chieves can do it. But they need to start clicking pretty soon.
Meh.
They did this same shit last year in the second half including the masterpiece against the Raiders on Christmas Day. Except they lost a lot more. They're winning the games this year, instead of losing the close ones.
But, ultimately, it didn't matter as they just flipped a switch when the playoffs got here and went ham on the Bills and Ravens in their own backyard.
If they take care of business in the post-season, no one will remember anything about the Chiefs regular season outside of they finished 15-2 or 14-3. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Is it, though? It seems like the Chieves haven't played a really good game in weeks, except possibly against Buffalo.
I think the Chieves need to buckle down and stop eking out these wins against mediocre opponents. Otherwise, this seems to be setting up for a hungry Buffalo or Ratbird team to win decisively in the playoffs.
To be clear, I definitely think the Chieves can do it. But they need to start clicking pretty soon.
You're so fucking dumb. The donks are sitting at a +71 point differential. We have +56. We've been buckling down all season. The only thing your team knows how to buckle is the strap-on your lesbian coach uses.
That's why we're the #1 seed, and the donks might make the playoffs.
If we got any better there isn't a tampon large enough to shove up your hole that would stop the bleeding. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Did you really just ask if KC's starters are different from their backups? :-):-):-)
This might be an all-timer.
And are you calling LAC a mediocre opponent? They're a playoff team that led the Broncos 23-0 in Mile High before going prevent. Denver's offense did zilch until garbage time against a team with half its secondary out, and several more key players that went down during the course of the game.
I don't think the Chargers are very good. But I was really talking about the entirety of KC's recent performance, including the Raiders, Bucs, and Broncos.
Because Denver also is a mediocre team. KC should be stomping at least some of these teams and they aren't.
Of course, I think you know very well that I wasn't suggesting there isn't a difference between KC's starters and backups. I was suggesting that the assumption starters will obviously and decisively beat Denver is not valid based on KC's current performance level. [Reply]
Originally Posted by rydogg58:
You're so ****ing dumb. The donks are sitting at a +71 point differential. We have +56. We've been buckling down all season. The only thing your team knows how to buckle is the strap-on your lesbian coach uses.
That's why we're the #1 seed, and the donks might make the playoffs.
If we got any better there isn't a tampon large enough to shove up your hole that would stop the bleeding.
Are you sure you're responding to my post? There wasn't anything in my post suggesting Denver is better than KC.
Denver is a middling team this year. The Raiders are a bad team this year. Carolina is a seriously bad team.
You're going to pretend you're happy squeaking by against these teams?
KC can play much better than they have been playing. If they don't start doing so pretty soon, they're going to struggle against the really good teams in the AFC--Buffalo and Ratbirds--in the playoffs. [Reply]
They did this same shit last year in the second half including the masterpiece against the Raiders on Christmas Day. Except they lost a lot more. They're winning the games this year, instead of losing the close ones.
But, ultimately, it didn't matter as they just flipped a switch when the playoffs got here and went ham on the Bills and Ravens in their own backyard.
If they take care of business in the post-season, no one will remember anything about the Chiefs regular season outside of they finished 15-2 or 14-3. :-)
For sure. They can play much better.
I just think there's a significant fuck around and find out risk for any team that's not firing on all cylinders when the playoffs come. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Is it, though? It seems like the Chieves haven't played a really good game in weeks, except possibly against Buffalo.
I think the Chieves need to buckle down and stop eking out these wins against mediocre opponents. Otherwise, this seems to be setting up for a hungry Buffalo or Ratbird team to win decisively in the playoffs.
To be clear, I definitely think the Chieves can do it. But they need to start clicking pretty soon.
Correct me if Im wrong, but hasn't Denver beaten only one team with a winning record?
I think the Cheating Donx need to buckle down and stop losing to teams with winning records. Otherwise if they manage to squeak into the playoffs, this seems to be setting up for any team with a winning record to beat them. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Are you sure you're responding to my post? There wasn't anything in my post suggesting Denver is better than KC.
Denver is a middling team this year. The Raiders are a bad team this year. Carolina is a seriously bad team.
You're going to pretend you're happy squeaking by against these teams?
KC can play much better than they have been playing. If they don't start doing so pretty soon, they're going to struggle against the really good teams in the AFC--Buffalo and Ratbirds--in the playoffs.
Happy with 12-1 and having the inside track on the 1 seed, the year after winning their 2nd straight Super Bowl?