Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Ok, I get it! You're pushing a theory that winning the SB is all that matters, and that until a franchise wins it's first SB, it is a disappointing, embarrassing failure.
You're still waiting for your Donkeys franchise to "win" a SB, as everybody knows that the Donks had 3 gifted to them. Your problem (along with all the other Donktards) is you can't discern the difference between a legit 'win' and a 'gift' -- they are NOT one and the same. [Reply]
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
You're still waiting for your Donkeys franchise to "win" a SB, as everybody knows that the Donks had 3 gifted to them. Your problem (along with all the other Donktards) is you can't discern the difference between a legit 'win' and a 'gift' -- they are NOT one and the same.
Shit...he's waiting for his team to beat someone with a winning record. They are the best of the 2-3 win teams...congrats? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Shit...he's waiting for his team to beat someone with a winning record. They are the best of the 2-3 win teams...congrats?
Which makes that blocked FG last Sunday all that much sweeter and an all-time classic & DonkeyBuffoon still hasn't been able clean out his drawers from it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
Which makes that blocked FG last Sunday all that much sweeter and an all-time classic & DonkeyBuffoon still hasn't been able clean out his drawers from it.
I'm laughing (again) just thinking about it...one of the most satisfying endings in KC/Donk history. I'll remember, 10 years from now, where I was. That's the pay-off we all seek from watching sports.
They cant even rationalize it as luck...Chiefs researched that exact play/weakness and exploited it. They got beat straight up...by a superior team. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Ok, I get it! You're pushing a theory that winning the SB is all that matters, and that until a franchise wins it's first SB, it is a disappointing, embarrassing failure.
Loaded with "angst."
That might've made sense when leagues were 8, 10, 12 teams, but 32 is a lotta teams, and there's still what - 11, 12 teams without a SB win?
You must realize I also see you're trying to prop up a theory of excellence that includes the Chiefs and excludes the Broncos. That's not gonna be easy... calling everything before any team's first SB win a "failure" is ridiculous.
In what sense?
.
No, I don't think SBs are all that matters. I'm just staying consistent w/ your logic. You've said that KC was "really bad" for 50 years, remember? That means your standard of a decent season is reaching the SB.
You want to push a narrative that Broncos fans were on cloud 9 for 50 years. It's laughable. Even when Denver was good, they usually ended the season on a horribly embarrassing note. And since going B2B, it's been a mediocre franchise with a few standout seasons.
Plenty of angst in Broncos country throughout their 60+ years as a franchise.
In Denver's history, how many times have fans truly felt satisfied with how the season ended? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
I'm laughing (again) just thinking about it...one of the most satisfying endings in KC/Donk history.
They cant even rationalize it as luck...Chiefs researched that exact play/weakness and exploited it. They got beat straight up...by a superior team.
That's right, as Leo and Furious George just kicked the Donkey's O-line's a$$ on that play and Donktards can only create false spin about the play to make themselves feel better -- which is why you and I are still laughing about it.
I'm not so sure that Leo and Furious George are aware of what they really accomplished in the eyes of many long-time Chiefs that are in the know about what's gone on in the past in the Donks/Chiefs series. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Can we all agree that watching the Donks lose in the worst way possible was spectacular? Literally the last second when they were almost celebrating. I'd take that over a blow out every time...
I mean this was their Superbowl...they've waited all year for it....and a chance at respectability. Nope...still the average team they've been for a decade...another year, another losing season.
Played our D+ game and still ripped their hearts out. God, you love to see it! I swear I hate those fuckers so much... losing at home to them would've damn near ruined my season no matter how well we finish. It's almost like wining the epic 13 second game only to choke it all away against the Bengals the next week. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Remember that time that Donk thought they would beat the CHIEFS by kicking a chip shot 35 - yard FG, only to have the Chiefs #54 Leo and #56 Furious George kick the Donks O-Lines A$$ and block that FG?
Sorry TEX, but I just couldn't resist adding that 2nd part in to your quote. :-) [Reply]
Yeah...the franchise, coach and QB that sent him to the GM glue factory. There is no way you believe what you just posted.
Without a QB doped out on HGH and using this to recruit players...he was straight executive trash. His ability to identify the very worst OL and overpay them was an art form.
The moment Manning retired...he was exposed for the fraud he always was.
I think it impacted some of you more than it did him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by brdempsey:
You're still waiting for your Donkeys franchise to "win" a SB
No, I'm still "WAITING" for you to give me something, anything, that supports your accusation that SB50 was rigged and "gifted" to Manning.
And I am sorry, but I reject your submission of "chat-bots on NFL com" as evidence.
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
If you're talking about Montana and Elway, only Montana belongs in that top 100 and Elway does not. As BlackOp said, Elway was always a fraud.
No, talking about the little 'dogfaceboy' post you re-posted accusing MANNING and Elway of colluding to be "gifted" SB win or wins.
Those are the two Anniversary Top 100
Originally Posted by brdempsey:
We do not 'think' that the Donkeys SB's were fixed -- it is stark reality & overwhelming proof of that has been posted in this thread, which you've been unable to answer or refute.
"Stark reality ..."
"Overwhelming proof ..."
"Post in this thread ..."
"Unable to refute ..."
Congratulations, big guy. You're a poet.
But these absolute, brick-wall terms, you use them constantly. Don't confuse me for somebody who doesn't realize this is having a negative effect in your private life. There are highly effective, simple treatments.... look for them.
. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Still more of my DonkeyBuffoon "piss on my own head & tell myself it's raining" blather because I (DonkeyBuffoon) can't stomach the truth being put in front of me that has made me crap in my diaper & now I (DonkeyBuffoon) need my mommy to change my diaper, fetch my formula, and give me a Baby Pat-A-Burp doll to put on my shoulder, so that I (DonkeyBuffoon) can cry on the doll's shoulder. Everybody should have a pity party for me (DonkeyBuffoon)......1, 2, 3. AWWWWWW
Fixed.
And there is the obvious 'treatment' that you need. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
No, I'm still "WAITING" for you to give me something, anything, that supports your accusation that SB50 was rigged and "gifted" to Manning.
And I am sorry, but I reject your submission of "chat-bots on NFL com" as evidence.
No, talking about the little 'dogfaceboy' post you re-posted accusing MANNING and Elway of colluding to be "gifted" SB win or wins.
Those are the two Anniversary Top 100
"Stark reality ..."
"Overwhelming proof ..."
"Post in this thread ..."
"Unable to refute ..."
Congratulations, big guy. You're a poet.
But these absolute, brick-wall terms, you use them constantly. Don't confuse me for somebody who doesn't realize this is having a negative effect in your private life. There are highly effective, simple treatments.... look for them.
.
Buffy :-)
Seriously, what's wrong with you? You try so hard, yet fail. Just like Denver. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Buffy :-)
Seriously, what's wrong with you? You try so hard, yet fail. Just like Denver. :-)
(DDS) Donktard Derangement Syndrome is what's wrong with him.
DonkeyBuffoon talks about Elway and Manning, but per say, if I have a team that's good enough to win a Conference Championship, NO WAY would I want Elway or Manning under Center heading into a Super Bowl.
Elway played like a girl in multiple SB's with Elway's throwing style looking like Elway was pulling a turd out of his back pocket, and repeatedly throwing it in off-target, 110 MPH fastball fashion, desperately hoping it would stick to one of his receivers for a completion (but often times it wound up sticking to opposing defenders for an INT -- 8 times to be precise in the SB).
Manning would repeatedly pile up big stats in the regular season, then drop a big pile in his shorts in the post-season. [Reply]
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
Fixed.
And there is the obvious 'treatment' that you need.
Originally Posted by TEX:
Buffy
Seriously, what's wrong with you? You try so hard, yet fail.
I do?
Try what, and fail how?
You guys have GOT to be the rudest SOBs I've run across in a good while. You just keep haranguing me and haranguing me, and because I'm a "guest" here I feel compelled to respond.
And the haranguing often makes no sense. Dempsey, I didn't post that about Elway and Manning - you did. It was a screenshot clip of a post by 'dog-faced boy.'
And ferhevvinsake, STOP TYPING UP POSTS AND PUTTING MY NAME ON THEM!
