Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
What's the point of any statistical comparison? You make the 'analysis' of however many Broncos losses in a row there were to the Chiefs until last year. I was never so hypocritical as to pretend there's nothing to that analysis.
Look, I get it, you don't like the result. First 48 years in the NFL and just 4 playoff wins, 2 in the same year. I'd call that a drought, but that would be an insult to deserts everywhere.
I remember now why I went down this road! You guys attacked and kicked and beat and insulted me and the Broncos when I showed up. It's been more than just a dislike of a rival team, there's a deeper resentment in the way you go about it. So, we back up and take a look - and Bingo! Most of you seem scarred in different ways after having to look up at Big Bro Broncos for so long.
So now you grab on to these current Chiefs, tight as you possibly can, INSISTENT that they will heal all wounds. Five decades worth. You even resent the idea that Mahomes is a solid 90-95% of it.
.
1970 = Merger and 26-team interplay takes effect
2018 = First year Mahomes inserted as starter
.
Don't pretend there's not meaningful info to be gleaned from that.
But go ahead if you think they're relevant statistical analysis to be made by deducting the Elway and Manning years. There might be some value in deducting one of them. But I don't think both. The two together have little relation to one another in my opinion.
See, we don't need to resort to timeframing or deducting. And if we did, we'd use a sensible cut-off point, like "this millennium" or "last 10 years," rather than "If you drop the first and the last decade and pretend they never happened, we'd have the edge, dude!!"
Look, I get it....you can't bear to face reality, so you're forced to manufacture your own reality. Glad it's you and not us! [Reply]
Originally Posted by rydogg58:
I didn't read any of this.
Originally Posted by PastaBrioni:
Lulz...didn't read
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
This guy's a reporter? Sheesh. At least some of the Denver fans are shaming him in the comments.
Guys, being proud of NOT reading something is pretty sad.
And the other guy, comparing our two scores vs. Tampa Bay? That's SARCASM, geniuses! He's phishing you, and you fell hook line and sinker (look, BroncoBLUFF spelled "fishing" wrong!)
I suppose we shouldn't expect more from a bunch of guys who thought earning a doctorate meant you were a medical doctor. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Guys, being proud of NOT reading something is pretty sad.
And the other guy, comparing our two scores vs. Tampa Bay? That's SARCASM, geniuses! He's phishing you, and you fell hook line and sinker (look, BroncoBLUFF spelled "fishing" wrong!)
I suppose we shouldn't expect more from a bunch of guys who thought earning a doctorate meant you were a medical doctor.
When it's unprompted like that? Usually sarcasm tries to make a point. People don't just speak up out of nowhere with a sarcastic statement.
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Guys, being proud of NOT reading something is pretty sad.
And the other guy, comparing our two scores vs. Tampa Bay? That's SARCASM, geniuses! He's phishing you, and you fell hook line and sinker (look, BroncoBLUFF spelled "fishing" wrong!)
I suppose we shouldn't expect more from a bunch of guys who thought earning a doctorate meant you were a medical doctor.
I think everybody's aware that he doesn't actually think the Broncos are 13 points better than the Chiefs. Even Denver fans aren't quite that delusional. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
I think everybody's aware that he doesn't actually think the Broncos are 13 points better than the Chiefs. Even Denver fans aren't quite that delusional.
Zach Stevens is literally knowmo. Dude has been blowing the Broncos for years [Reply]
I've been nothing but complimentary to your team's dynasty in my ~2 weeks visiting here, and especially complimentary to your founder Lamar Hunt. Despite this, you've attacked, insulted and piled on top of me for just two reasons:
.
my statistical analysis of your first five decades (48 yrs) in the NFL, with just four playoff wins, and
Denying the Broncos salary violations in the '90s resulted in an onfield competitive advantage because the League said it didn't
Never even talked current football with me... FYI, I didn't think we'd win last week, don't think so this week either.
Now... if you're not obsessively prejudiced against the Broncos and their fans, why such treatment? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
I've been nothing but complimentary to your team's dynasty in my ~2 weeks visiting here, and especially complimentary to your founder Lamar Hunt. Despite this, you've attacked, insulted and piled on top of me for just two reasons:
.
my statistical analysis of your first five decades (48 yrs) in the NFL, with just four playoff wins, and
Denying the Broncos salary violations in the '90s resulted in an onfield competitive advantage because the League said it didn't
Never even talked current football with me... FYI, I didn't think we'd win last week, don't think so this week either.
Now... if you're not obsessively prejudiced against the Broncos and their fans, why such treatment?
Try reading this again carefully:
Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
Hey DonkoBuffoon! Do you like to piss into the wind in real life too, or do you just prefer to do that in this thread? Because that's exactly what you're doing. A dozen guys (give or take) telling you what a dipshit you are and how crappy the cheating franchise that you root for is. Yet, you just keep coming back with the same stupid shit and more. And the funny thing is, you actually believe that everyone else is wrong and you're the only one that's right. SMH. Guess what dipshit? You're not right. Go beat your chest on the Puddle. Maybe you can find some braindead morons over there to agree with you