Winning the superbowl on the faiders turf, before they played a playoff game there, and horseface running the Chiefs gauntlet to deliver the trophy are the cherries on top. Horseface wanted to be the one to give the trophy to baby rat. You just know it chapped his ass, that the Chiefs won. [Reply]
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
No, it's a clear-cut case of you being in DESPERATION, because all your Donktard bragging rights & so-called accolades get reduced to sawdust in the light of harsh reality.
:
... you still don't realize you've been proven wrong about what Pat needed the money for?
The League's final report made it very clear that preliminary stadium costs were what the money was needed for. You really ought to read those links .... If you don't know how to click links, run upstairs and ask your mom, she'll know.
BUT PLEASE: Why was John Elway the Guest of Honor who awarded you your back-to-back Super Bowl trophy? WHY?!
Originally Posted by FlaChief58:
Winning the superbowl on the faiders turf, before they played a playoff game there, and horseface running the Chiefs gauntlet to deliver the trophy are the cherries on top. Horseface wanted to be the one to give the trophy to baby rat. You just know it chapped his ass, that the Chiefs won.
Elway looked like he was about ready to swallow his tongue. [Reply]
I doubt Elway cared too much about handing the trophy to KC. IIRC, he was an honorary captain as part of the 25th anniversary of the SB they win and he was MVP. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
... you still don't realize you've been proven wrong about what Pat needed the money for?
The League's final report made it very clear that preliminary stadium costs were what the money was needed for. You really ought to read those links .... If you don't know how to click links, run upstairs and ask your mom, she'll know.
BUT PLEASE: Why was John Elway the Guest of Honor who awarded you your back-to-back Super Bowl trophy? WHY?!
.
Larry Csonka and John Elway were chosen to carry the Trophy to the Chiefs to represent the 50th and 25th anniversaries respectively of their Super Bowl MVP performances. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
��... you still don't realize you've been proven wrong about what Pat needed the money for?
The League's final report made it very clear that preliminary stadium costs were what the money was needed for. You really ought to read those links .... If you don't know how to click links, run upstairs and ask your mom, she'll know.
.
You haven't proven me wrong about anything & you're just p!ssing on your own head & telling yourself it's raining, with that one. All that BS about "needing funds for a new stadium" has been disproven beyond any shadow of a doubt -- regardless of what dick-faced Bowlen or any league spokesman said.
As for the 'mom' part, why don't you go ask your mom why she failed to take her birth-control pills at whatever point in time that you were conceived. [Reply]