ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 5213 of 5215
« First < 4213471351135163520352095210521152125213 52145215 >
Nzoner's Game Room>Broncos news megathread
ROYC75 04:26 PM 08-12-2014
Discussion: All things Broncos.
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 09:14 AM Today
It was amusing?
[Reply]
FlaChief58 09:15 AM Today
Winning the superbowl on the faiders turf, before they played a playoff game there, and horseface running the Chiefs gauntlet to deliver the trophy are the cherries on top. Horseface wanted to be the one to give the trophy to baby rat. You just know it chapped his ass, that the Chiefs won.
[Reply]
BroncoBuff 09:17 AM Today
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
No, it's a clear-cut case of you being in DESPERATION, because all your Donktard bragging rights & so-called accolades get reduced to sawdust in the light of harsh reality.
:

��... you still don't realize you've been proven wrong about what Pat needed the money for?

The League's final report made it very clear that preliminary stadium costs were what the money was needed for. You really ought to read those links .... If you don't know how to click links, run upstairs and ask your mom, she'll know.


BUT PLEASE: Why was John Elway the Guest of Honor who awarded you your back-to-back Super Bowl trophy? WHY?!

.
[Reply]
brdempsey69 09:18 AM Today
Originally Posted by FlaChief58:
Winning the superbowl on the faiders turf, before they played a playoff game there, and horseface running the Chiefs gauntlet to deliver the trophy are the cherries on top. Horseface wanted to be the one to give the trophy to baby rat. You just know it chapped his ass, that the Chiefs won.
Elway looked like he was about ready to swallow his tongue.
[Reply]
Pasta Little Brioni 09:19 AM Today
Was there or was there not proven cheating in 97 98 and Superfarce 50 season?
[Reply]
BroncoBuff 09:21 AM Today
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
Was there or was there not proven cheating in 97 98 and Superfarce 50 season?
There were violations in 97-98, not affecting on-field competitive balance.

Not sure what you've got cooked up for violations of Super Bowl 50.
[Reply]
Mile High Mania 09:21 AM Today
I doubt Elway cared too much about handing the trophy to KC. IIRC, he was an honorary captain as part of the 25th anniversary of the SB they win and he was MVP.
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 09:22 AM Today
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
��... you still don't realize you've been proven wrong about what Pat needed the money for?

The League's final report made it very clear that preliminary stadium costs were what the money was needed for. You really ought to read those links .... If you don't know how to click links, run upstairs and ask your mom, she'll know.


BUT PLEASE: Why was John Elway the Guest of Honor who awarded you your back-to-back Super Bowl trophy? WHY?!

.
Larry Csonka and John Elway were chosen to carry the Trophy to the Chiefs to represent the 50th and 25th anniversaries respectively of their Super Bowl MVP performances.
[Reply]
BroncoBuff 09:22 AM Today
Oh.

Thank you S&S....
[Reply]
brdempsey69 09:26 AM Today
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
��... you still don't realize you've been proven wrong about what Pat needed the money for?

The League's final report made it very clear that preliminary stadium costs were what the money was needed for. You really ought to read those links .... If you don't know how to click links, run upstairs and ask your mom, she'll know.


.
You haven't proven me wrong about anything & you're just p!ssing on your own head & telling yourself it's raining, with that one. All that BS about "needing funds for a new stadium" has been disproven beyond any shadow of a doubt -- regardless of what dick-faced Bowlen or any league spokesman said.

As for the 'mom' part, why don't you go ask your mom why she failed to take her birth-control pills at whatever point in time that you were conceived.
[Reply]
Pasta Little Brioni 09:28 AM Today
I seem to remember cap violations and hgh delivered under a wife's name
[Reply]
Pasta Little Brioni 09:29 AM Today
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
There were violations in 97-98, not affecting on-field competitive balance.

Not sure what you've got cooked up for violations of Super Bowl 50.
It did effect competitive balance by all legit sources

Hgh?
[Reply]
BroncoBuff 09:30 AM Today
Hahaha, okay ... the mom thing was just a joke ferhevvinsake.

But why does the reason Bowlen needed that cash matter so much to you?
[Reply]
Pasta Little Brioni 09:31 AM Today
The next time I'm wrong in this thread will be the first, BIFF
[Reply]
BroncoBuff 09:41 AM Today
OOOH! Okay, but he only started 10 games in 2015, and still he threw the 2nd most Ints in the League (Bortles).

The greatest offense in League history - the 2013 Broncos - was, like almost every great offense, beaten in the SB.

But the 2015 team - that was all defense, smacked another great #1 offense, the 15-1 Panthers.

Manning had very little to do with it. Almost impossible to make any argument that even if he did cheat he made any difference.
[Reply]
Page 5213 of 5215
« First < 4213471351135163520352095210521152125213 52145215 >
Up