Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
Well, the problem as I see it, the interesting part, isn't the total Super Bowls. Nobody can take the past six years away from the Chiefs. Their current dynasty is on par with 90s Cowboys - maybe even the 70s Steelers.
But BEFORE Mahomes, over the Broncos and Chiefs first five decades - first 48 years in the Big Leagues, in the NFL, the contrast between the two teams is enormous:
That was a long, looong desolation road for KC. Calling those 48 years a "drought" would be an insult to deserts everywhere.
Meanwhile the Broncos became an elite NFL Franchise. In those 48 years, the Broncos were featured in national TV telecasts more than any other team (largely because they were one of the few teams with home games in the late doubleheader window).
Second most SB appearances of any team - in fact, the Broncos, Patriots and Steelers together represented the AFC in more than half those Super Bowls - and the Broncos' Super Bowls were not all clumped together - they came in the Mid-late 70s, the Mid-late 80s, the Mid-late 90s, and the early-mid teens. All those eras but the 70s were MULTIPLE SB appearances.
Broncos were featured on MNF a record 44 straight years, had a Pro Bowl player a record 47 straight years, and hold the longest (and current) home sellout streak - there has never been an available seat for a Broncos NFL game after the Wednesday of a game week ever.
All these things add up. That, plus the desolation the Chiefs were going through for such a long looong time, THAT'S what's behind this thread. THAT'S what makes you guys so resentful.
Who cares what happened so many years ago? The Chiefs have erased all of that in a span of 6 years.
The Chiefs are the most popular team in America and their dynasty is better than any run you guys have ever had.
Meanwhile the Broncos have been a poverty franchise for nearly 10 years now [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
(A)Sure there were new players, but your accusations, and my defense, were about adding BETTER players than the current guys BECAUSE we made extra cap room by cheating.
(B)FB Howard Griffith was a downgrade from Aaron Craver:
OT Gary Zimmerman retired after first SB - 1st ballot HOF
So obviously there's cap room opened up there
Don't remember Willie Flipper Anderson ever being a Bronco
Neil Smith helped lots, but I mentioned him and I mentioned a few others on your list.
_________
(C) Guys, I told you. The League's position is they check EVERY roster EVERY week. If there's a problem with the cap they inform the team and the team has to make a change in their roster before they take the field.
(A) The argument was your Donkeys added multiple players to their roster UNLIKE any other team did at that time -- for which they got called out for publicly by Al Davis, and the NFL fined them & docked them draft picks for TWICE, in order to save face and avoid a PR nightmare.
(B) Your Griffith argument is just a strawman & you ain't even got Griffith's stats correct. In 4 years, Griffith had 117 rushing yds & 445 receiving yds. Try again.
Zimmerman was on the 1997 roster wearing the grease on his jersey, but nothing about Zimmerman accounts for Swayne being added to the roster in 1997. And nothing you said about Neil Smith changes your statement of "added just Darrien Gordon and Neil Smith on defense" which was proven false (Keith Traylor, Dedrick Dodge).
(C) The only thing you're telling us is that the League office DIDN'T do what you are suggesting, and when the Donks got publicly exposed for cheating & violating the salary cap later on, they had to scramble to save face.
At the end of the day, the Donks all-time SB record still stands at 0 wins, 5 losses, and 3 given to them as going-away present (2 to Elway & 1 to Manning). [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
All these things add up. That, plus the desolation the Chiefs were going through for such a long looong time, THAT'S what's behind this thread. THAT'S what makes you guys so resentful.
RUBBISH -- the resentment comes from Donktards like you trying to sell the us the false narrative of the Donks so-called SB wins as being legit, when there's overwhelming evidence put right in front of you that they aren't, and you desperately try to avoid by any means. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
All these things add up. That, plus the desolation the Chiefs were going through for such a long looong time, THAT'S what's behind this thread. THAT'S what makes you guys so resentful.
No...
What's behind this thread is every team's fanbase visits this site when it's their time to play KC...and most are likely unaware that the Donks have the most verified cheating offenses in the history of the NFL....that all 3 SB titles are mired is scandal/controversy.
If they aren't from the AFCW or even the AFC...they might need to be educated in what a corrupt franchise the Broncos have always been.
Nobody cares about the Broncos anymore...so no opposing fans visit their site. Their own fans barely show up...
It's our duty...for the betterment of humanity... to shine a light on the perpetual cheaters that your tarnished franchise is.
Hell...even your current coach got banned for an entire year. [Reply]
Douche with the team that was ringless until 1997 and whose name was just as famous as the Buffalo Bills in terms of Super Bowl LOSERS wants to talk about, "Well, before such and such a year, things weren't that good!"
What's next? Are you going to go troll the Steelers for not fielding any teams worth a shit prior to Chuck Noll? [Reply]
Wow! DonkoDuffo is as pathetic as knowshit and kramzitinhisrectum. That was quite the post about the past. It doesn't matter that the Chiefs went through a period similar to what the Cheating Donks are going through now while the Donks were coming up short until they resorted to cheating to win. Denver never had a dynasty. They had a few good years with ElFraud and fivehead. But nothing close to what the Chiefs have going now. Your pathetic fanbase is All Bundy. Bragging about the past with accomplishments that only matter to you. And now, you're all just going nowhere in life and nobody respects you.
Oh, and the 90's Cowboys are at the bottom of the list in Dynasties. They barely won outside of a 5 year window. The Chiefs have already passed that dynasty and are quickly gaining ground on the Patriots dynasty. [Reply]
Douche with the team that was ringless until 1997 and whose name was just as famous as the Buffalo Bills in terms of Super Bowl LOSERS wants to talk about, "Well, before such and such a year, things weren't that good!"
You're like Trump people - You don't understand that the people who DECIDE whether Super Bowls are crooked or elections are stolen - they've already decided, and they're not you.
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
"Such and such" a year?!
I'm talking the FIRST 48 YEARS in the NFL!
.
Why don't you try talking about each teams first 10 years of existence in the American Football League & the Donkeys overwhelming blazing 1-19 record against the Texans/Chiefs from 1960 -- 1969? Kinda smacks of what's happened over the past decade, now doesn't it?
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff:
And WTF is your problem with 2015?
If you have to ask that question, then it's obvious that you must have LSD suppositories down to an art form.
It's been discussed to death all over the web that the fix was in, in 2015, to give Manning a going-away present. Here is an example:
Originally Posted by :
@dogfacedboy6947
1 year ago
The reason that John Elway chased after Payton Manning SO HARD was because he knew that he would be "gifted" a Super Bowl or two in his last years. BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED TO ELWAY.
This just also happened to have been discussed to death over at NFL.com during 2015 & so much so that NFL.com shut down their comments section, as multiple posters from all over the land were acknowledging that the league was gifting Manning and the Donks a going-away present, just like they had done with Elway in '97 and '98. [Reply]
Originally Posted by PHOG:
All-time record: 72–56 Chiefs.....Chiefs 4 SBs...Donkos 3 SBs under protest.
Well, if you insist on counting AFL games, but according to your own Lamar Hunt, no. Funny how we were the worst record (by far) in the AFL, but in just our third NFL year we had our first winning record, and started 46 year streak with no consecutive losing seasons ... best in all major team sports (Dodgers second 29 years). Kind of a weird record, but it's a hallmark of consistency.
And we were 1-19 vs. chiefs in AFL, Lamar (who was truly a great man) advised survival first for AFL franchises. [Reply]
