Originally Posted by RealSNR:
Both Green Bay and Kansas City have more Super Bowls than big ol’ Denver with its huuuuuge market and rich ass owners you crow about all the time because they’re all you’ve got going.
As if the Hunt family isn’t also loaded. Also as if the salary cap makes it so it doesn’t matter how much money your owner has when putting together a championship team
Exactly right. The Chiefs are where they are at now because they DRAFTED well, and the Donks are where they're at now because they didn't draft well. Cut and dried. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
They're all that way... But he's a real dipshit Mule Tool. I've read his stuff over at the Mane and the Huddle. He spews stupidity wherever he goes.
Bronco Fluff is a nobody trying to be somebody.
He reeks of needing attention and validation from another team that owns them.
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
This is absolute BS. Just how far did you have to dig into your own anal cavity to pull out this load of crap? The Donks got fined and coughed up draft picks.
The Donks cheating & violating the cap allowed them to have multiple players on their roster that they had no business having & did give them an advantage.
Donkeys all-time SB record stands at 0 wins, 5 losses, and 3 given to them by the league as going-away presents.
Post the evidence this is BS. This is what was reported.
Now, it’s possible this was a huge coverup and the actual violations were different. But what evidence do you have of that being the case, aside from you wanting it to be the case? [Reply]
Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan:
Bronco Fluff is a nobody trying to be somebody.
He reeks of needing attention and validation from another team that owns them.
Ignore him
Yep. I ignore all of them but MHM and Hef. Those guys have been here throughout KC's dominance and actually show up after losses. The rest are front running cowards. They're lucky we even let them post here. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Post the evidence this is BS. This is what was reported.
Now, it’s possible this was a huge coverup and the actual violations were different. But what evidence do you have of that being the case, aside from you wanting it to be the case?
You just quoted the evidence. The Donks got fined & docked draft picks. Plus, the fact that Al Davis went public with it exposing the Donks scandalous activities.
It isn't a case of me "wanting it to be the case" -- it is stark reality with overwhelming evidence to back it. Nice try with that one, but you FAIL.
Try naming any other team that added players to their roster (or as many as the Donks did) in the illegitimate manner the Donkeys did in 1996 -- 1998. You CAN'T.
As far as "what's reported" goes, do consider the reports of the Donkeys absurd excuses for violating the salary cap being such as "accounting errors" or "deferring payments to fund a new stadium" -- both of which are completely false and ridiculous and only idiots would accept it without question (like Donkeys fans who gobble up this nonsense like doo-doo eating dogs gobbling up freshly dropped feces). [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Post the evidence this is BS. This is what was reported.
Now, it’s possible this was a huge coverup and the actual violations were different. But what evidence do you have of that being the case, aside from you wanting it to be the case?
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
You just quoted the evidence. The Donks got fined & docked draft picks. Plus, the fact that Al Davis went public with it exposing the Donks scandalous activities.
It isn't a case of me "wanting it to be the case" -- it is stark reality with overwhelming evidence to back it. Nice try with that one, but you FAIL.
Try naming any other team that added players to their roster (or as many as the Donks did) in the illegitimate manner the Donkeys did in 1996 -- 1998. You CAN'T.
As far as "what's reported" goes, do consider the reports of the Donkeys absurd excuses for violating the salary cap being such as "accounting errors" or "deferring payments to fund a new stadium" -- both of which are completely false and ridiculous and only idiots would accept it without question (like Donkeys fans who gobble up this nonsense like doo-doo eating dogs gobbling up freshly dropped feces).
So no evidence then?
It was a violation and it was improper to defer the payments without reporting them. And that’s why the team was punished.
As for why Al Davis reported it—I think you can probably work that out on your own. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
So no evidence then?
It was a violation and it was improper to defer the payments without reporting them. And that’s why the team was punished.
As for why Al Davis reported it—I think you can probably work that out on your own.
LOL. Quite the contrary, you're wanting to imply "hurr durr no evidence then" because you can't answer or refute the evidence presented to you & just shows your desperation.
As for "deferring payments" that is provably false. Where were they deferring payments to? Couldn't possibly be to fund a new stadium as that was literally impossible given the timeline of Denver voters passing referendum 4A on Nov. 3, 1998 which was in favor of the construction of a new football stadium to replace the existing Mile High Stadium & the grounds being broken on Aug. 17, 1999.
How could they possibly be "deferring payments to fund a new stadium" in 1996, 1997, or 1998 when there was literally no such place for them to defer payments to?
It was just a bold-faced lie by Pat Bowlen when he got publicly exposed for violating & cheating the salary cap circa 2000-2002.
As for Al Davis, he wasn't right about everything, but was 100% right in this instance & all you're trying to do is employ the old proverbial copout of "can't attack the message, so attack the messenger" and if that's all you have, then you're in sad shape. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pablo:
Goddamn this guy wrecks Denver fans ^^
What I don't do is go to Donks fan sites & post anything that I've posted here.
Meanwhile these Donks fans go to other teams websites & peddle their false spin as though fans of other teams are obligated to accept it without question & they fail to fathom how they condemn themselves doing that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
LOL. Quite the contrary, you're wanting to imply "hurr durr no evidence then" because you can't answer or refute the evidence presented to you & just shows your desperation.
As for "deferring payments" that is provably false. Where were they deferring payments to? Couldn't possibly be to fund a new stadium as that was literally impossible given the timeline of Denver voters passing referendum 4A on Nov. 3, 1998 which was in favor of the construction of a new football stadium to replace the existing Mile High Stadium & the grounds being broken on Aug. 17, 1999.
How could they possibly be "deferring payments to fund a new stadium" in 1996, 1997, or 1998 when there was literally no such place for them to defer payments to?
It was just a bold-faced lie by Pat Bowlen when he got publicly exposed for violating & cheating the salary cap circa 2000-2002.
As for Al Davis, he wasn't right about everything, but was 100% right in this instance & all you're trying to do is employ the old proverbial copout of "can't attack the message, so attack the messenger" and if that's all you have, then you're in sad shape.
Originally Posted by brdempsey69:
LOL. Quite the contrary, you're wanting to imply "hurr durr no evidence then" because you can't answer or refute the evidence presented to you & just shows your desperation.
As for "deferring payments" that is provably false. Where were they deferring payments to? Couldn't possibly be to fund a new stadium as that was literally impossible given the timeline of Denver voters passing referendum 4A on Nov. 3, 1998 which was in favor of the construction of a new football stadium to replace the existing Mile High Stadium & the grounds being broken on Aug. 17, 1999.
How could they possibly be "deferring payments to fund a new stadium" in 1996, 1997, or 1998 when there was literally no such place for them to defer payments to?
It was just a bold-faced lie by Pat Bowlen when he got publicly exposed for violating & cheating the salary cap circa 2000-2002.
As for Al Davis, he wasn't right about everything, but was 100% right in this instance & all you're trying to do is employ the old proverbial copout of "can't attack the message, so attack the messenger" and if that's all you have, then you're in sad shape.
So your premise is that it is impossible for the Broncos to put funds in place to pay for the stadium before the moment the referendum passed. I wish that illogic surprised me.
But you keep going on and on about what you think didn’t happen. Where is the evidence for what you think did happen?
Specifically, where is the evidence that Denver was able to pay more, better players due to this issue, rather than paying part of the salary cap number for some players later than they should have? [Reply]
