A Bengals fan in a Broncos thread on a Chief board telling LIES about a Patriot playoff win...pathetic. Jack scored IF the whistle wasn't blown. He was NOT down.There's countless verification of this everywhere [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
A Bengals fan in a Broncos thread on a Chief board telling LIES about a Patriot playoff win...pathetic. Jack scored IF the whistle wasn't blown. He was NOT down.There's countless verification of this everywhere
Keep deflecting. It's been verified by the previous video that...
Originally Posted by notorious:
He didn't have possession until after contact had ended.
Tough either way.
That's how I saw it as well. The.play should have been allowed to continue. Then they review it. Had that process happened, its a TD. Refs quick whistle ended that.
Sean could have signed the Bo Nix type QB in FA and then drafted Bowers
Jaguars coach Doug Pederson on backup QB Mac Jones through 3 preseason games: (38-of-52 for 421 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INT, 4 sacks):
“Mac has played extremely well in the last couple of weeks and has really bought into what we do. He’ll still revert back to his Patriots ways every now…
Originally Posted by TEX:
That's how I saw it as well. The.play should have been allowed to continue. Then they review it. Had that process happened, its a TD. Refs quick whistle ended that.
You're right, tough call either way.
So what you're saying is....Pasta is right....again [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Sean could have signed the Bo Nix type QB in FA and then drafted Bowers
Jaguars coach Doug Pederson on backup QB Mac Jones through 3 preseason games: (38-of-52 for 421 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INT, 4 sacks):
“Mac has played extremely well in the last couple of weeks and has really bought into what we do. He’ll still revert back to his Patriots ways every now…
Originally Posted by DomCasual:
Yeah - but see, that's not the point. I hate that streak. Each of those games was like a swift kick in the balls. And while I certainly wouldn't call it our Super Bowl, I will definitely acknowledge that breaking the streak last year was sweet - not Super Bowl sweet; but definitely sweeter than most regular season victories. You guys have been better than us for a long, long time - and it hasn't really been close. It just is what it is.
Most of you would never say what I just said in those last two sentences. I've been a Broncos fan for a long time - and I have been posting and/or lurking on ChiefsPlanet and either the Orange Mane or Orange Huddle for more than twenty years. In that time, it's never been different. Does every team have its share of fans that are sore losers like that? Sure - of course they do. You guys just take it to a level that puts you on an island by yourselves, IMO.
That game in October just illustrated the point. One loss in nine years, and most of you immediately, predictably shift back into short-man-syndrome mode. It's odd because you're right in the middle of a run that most fans never get to experience. You would think the insecurity would have long since flowed down the stream.
"Insecurity" is just a card you guys like to pull to make yourselves feel like you still own an advantage.
99% of Denver fans are incapable of uttering a positive word about KC. And when their team's giving them no ammo, they pounce on off-the-field issues (despite Denver leading the league in arrests), or trash the city of Kansas City, or dish meth/cousin jokes (despite the fact that it's Coloradoans who can legally marry first cousins and also have higher rates of meth use). Denver fans break negative news about KC before it even reaches Chiefs boards.
If that isn't insecurity/short man syndrome, what is?
What are these examples of shifting to "short man syndrome" after that loss? Do you really think the average KC fan believes our team/franchise is in any way inferior to the Broncos at this point? Historically or otherwise? Denver fans spew this nonsense because you NEED to believe it. Because YOU are insecure. And desperate. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
"Insecurity" is just a card you guys like to pull to make yourselves feel like you still own an advantage.
99% of Denver fans are incapable of uttering a positive word about KC. And when their team's giving them no ammo, they pounce on off-the-field issues (despite Denver leading the league in arrests), or trash the city of Kansas City, or dish meth/cousin jokes (despite the fact that it's Coloradoans who can legally marry first cousins and also have higher rates of meth use). Denver fans break negative news about KC before it even reaches Chiefs boards.
If that isn't insecurity/short man syndrome, what is?
What are these examples of shifting to "short man syndrome" after that loss? Do you really think the average KC fan believes our team/franchise is in any way inferior to the Broncos at this point? Historically or otherwise? Denver fans spew this nonsense because you NEED to believe it. Because YOU are insecure. And desperate.
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
"Insecurity" is just a card you guys like to pull to make yourselves feel like you still own an advantage.
99% of Denver fans are incapable of uttering a positive word about KC. And when their team's giving them no ammo, they pounce on off-the-field issues (despite Denver leading the league in arrests), or trash the city of Kansas City, or dish meth/cousin jokes (despite the fact that it's Coloradoans who can legally marry first cousins and also have higher rates of meth use). Denver fans break negative news about KC before it even reaches Chiefs boards.
If that isn't insecurity/short man syndrome, what is?
What are these examples of shifting to "short man syndrome" after that loss? Do you really think the average KC fan believes our team/franchise is in any way inferior to the Broncos at this point? Historically or otherwise? Denver fans spew this nonsense because you NEED to believe it. Because YOU are insecure. And desperate.
It’s more ingrained than that. The new generation of Chiefs fans will think it’s weird, and they won’t embrace it. But for you older fans, it’s basically become a part of your DNA. And it’s an absolute fact. There have been studies done on it. Big studies. Well-funded studies.
As for all this, “now you want peace” stuff, I’ll just say that I have always tried to be friendly here. It’s just sports. I am a bit of a smartass, by nature - I’ve tried to tone it down, with age. But I have always liked the back-and-forth - both dishing it out, and taking it. I try to avoid situations where people might be justified in getting their feelings hurt (I didn’t post here in the few weeks after you guys lost that last one to us, for example). But I generally don’t dislike many people - certainly not anyone here (well, maybe one or two :-)). Those of you who visit the Huddle will know that you are welcomed there; and I chime in defensively whenever the locals jump on the bandwagon to get one of you banned. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
That's how I saw it as well. The.play should have been allowed to continue. Then they review it. Had that process happened, its a TD. Refs quick whistle ended that.
You're right, tough call either way.
Even if it continues, replay brings it back. Whether he gained control while he was touching the runner or right after, his momentum was putting him on the ground. Down by contact. If the ball was loose and he stood up then gained possession, then he can return it for a TD. Just like this play. Kareem gained possession after he disengaged with Lock but his momentum was carrying him to the ground. He got up, ran, fumbled and the Broncos recovered but it was brought back to where he went down (by contact) Bengals ball.
Imagine if the Chiefs were on offense. 100% of polled members on Chiefsplanet.com would vote down by contact.
But enough of that. Back to your Broncos bashing. [Reply]
