Originally Posted by Deberg_1990:
I get what you’re saying. But Alex was the best option available to Andy at the time. And Andy chose correctly. Can you name an option at the time that would have been better for the Chiefs?
Technically he wasn't available. They traded for him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990:
I get what you’re saying. But Alex was the best option available to Andy at the time. And Andy chose correctly. Can you name an option at the time that would have been better for the Chiefs?
A quarterback who is just good enough to pay big money but can never win you a Super Bowl is the worst QB that exists. Daniel Jones set the Giants back about 7 years. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Technically he wasn't available. They traded for him.
Originally Posted by BWillie:
A quarterback who is just good enough to pay big money but can never win you a Super Bowl is the worst QB that exists. Daniel Jones set the Giants back about 7 years.
What would you have done if you had taken over running the Chiefs at the beginning of 2013? [Reply]
Can you imagine a world where we drafted Geno 1:1 overall? Reid may have been fired. Mahomes may have been a Buffalo Bill. Thank God for Alex Smith!!!! [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bowser:
2017 was Smith's best statistical year of his career, and I don't think it's coincidence that happened with Mahomes waiting in the wings.
Buddy of mine is absolutely convinced we beat the Titans in January '18 wildcard game with Mahomes, even him making his second career start if it were to have happened. 20/20 vision and all, but it's hard to argue with him over it knowing what we know today.
Originally Posted by BWillie:
That's better than sticking with the same shitty QB for far too long. Look at the Dallas Cowboys. If you drafted - the guy - you'll know. Right away.
Draft another one the next year, and the next year. That is all that matters. Keep on swinging for the fence.
And the talent level on the rest of the team goes to shit because you keep using your top pick(s) on one position. [Reply]