Sooooooo what exactly is going on? I don’t see a UFO thread and it seems congress is currently and has been having sessions with “whistleblowers” about UFO’s. What these guys are saying is essentially telling us we are 100% not alone and our private contractors have all the information and evidence to prove this. With that said, are these guys credible?? [Reply]
Originally Posted by DenverChief:
Have you ever used a cellphone to try and take a picture of a full moon?
We have dramatically better optic technology than cell phones out there which are continuously recording the night sky for all kinds of different scientific and amateur purposes at all times. I think it's telling that there's still no irrefutable evidence from these kinds of independent sources. These whistleblowers have claimed for a long time now that the physical evidence of extraterrestrials exists, but have given endless excuses for why they can't just expose that info to the public. Elizondo in particular has used that excuse for 5-6 years straight. Always some excuse why they have to wait for some reason.
Show some actual evidence. Something, anything that can be independently verified. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Fish:
We have dramatically better optic technology than cell phones out there which are continuously recording the night sky for all kinds of different scientific and amateur purposes at all times. I think it's telling that there's still no irrefutable evidence from these kinds of independent sources. These whistleblowers have claimed for a long time now that the physical evidence of extraterrestrials exists, but have given endless excuses for why they can't just expose that info to the public. Elizondo in particular has used that excuse for 5-6 years straight. Always some excuse why they have to wait for some reason.
Show some actual evidence. Something, anything that can be independently verified.
And your response in another grainy artifacted night vision video? I mean, can you at least understand why people can't really get excited about that again? [Reply]