In some ways you'd have to say it's impressive because if you had thrown out before the year...
This team is going to lose WR 1 and WR 2 along with RB 1 and honestly RB 2, and the backfield room would be a guy who wasn't in anyone's training camp and just signed...a camp casualty from a bad team and a UDFA.
Your LT situation is in flux and hasn't been solidified.
Your franchise player isn't playing up to his standard level of play.
The teams 2nd best DL would start on PUP and you'd have a bit a hole after your first 2 CBs and you're still 4-0 while playing a schedule that wasn't a cakewalk...
That's honestly pretty impressive to come out of that 4-0. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
In some ways you'd have to say it's impressive because if you had thrown out before the year...
This team is going to lose WR 1 and WR 2 along with RB 1 and honestly RB 2, and the backfield room would be a guy who wasn't in anyone's training camp and just signed...a camp casualty from a bad team and a UDFA.
Your LT situation is in flux and hasn't been solidified.
Your franchise player isn't playing up to his standard level of play.
The teams 2nd best DL would start on PUP and you'd have a bit a hole after your first 2 CBs and you're still 4-0 while playing a schedule that wasn't a cakewalk...
That's honestly pretty impressive to come out of that 4-0.
We've got the Carrs next week then the bye and a very beatable 49ers team (IDK what their injuries will look like wk 6 though), so we're at worst 4-2, probably 5-1 and it's very possible we're 6-0 a third of the way through the season. Given the injuries that's extremely good. [Reply]
There was an article in the Athletic that covered this.
Looking at all the teams who started 4-0 and including their point differential, the Vikings (PD of 50 in 4 games) are near the top.
Chiefs however...
• Chiefs: The Chiefs do not appear in the tables above because their 20-point differential ranks fourth-worst among the 100 teams to start 4-0 since 1989. Only the 1991 Bears (14), 1993 Eagles (17) and 1999 Patriots (19) had lower scoring differentials from that group.
So, technically not the worst 4-0 start ever. Just the fourth worst.
Originally Posted by Mecca:
In some ways you'd have to say it's impressive because if you had thrown out before the year...
This team is going to lose WR 1 and WR 2 along with RB 1 and honestly RB 2, and the backfield room would be a guy who wasn't in anyone's training camp and just signed...a camp casualty from a bad team and a UDFA.
Your LT situation is in flux and hasn't been solidified.
Your franchise player isn't playing up to his standard level of play.
The teams 2nd best DL would start on PUP and you'd have a bit a hole after your first 2 CBs and you're still 4-0 while playing a schedule that wasn't a cakewalk...
That's honestly pretty impressive to come out of that 4-0.
Originally Posted by TinyEvel:
There was an article in the Athletic that covered this.
Looking at all the teams who started 4-0 and including their point differential, the Vikings (PD of 50 in 4 games) are near the top.
Chiefs however...
• Chiefs: The Chiefs do not appear in the tables above because their 20-point differential ranks fourth-worst among the 100 teams to start 4-0 since 1989. Only the 1991 Bears (14), 1993 Eagles (17) and 1999 Patriots (19) had lower scoring differentials from that group.
So, technically not the worst 4-0 start ever. Just the fourth worst.
