And no, Romeo isn't a good DC. We built, for 4 years a defensive lineup based on his schem and it still was dirty hair. Read and react defenses aren't shit unless you have elite talent. [Reply]
Could be. But he was also teaching zone to a defense used to attacking, and was missing his defensive captain, head coach, and LBs coach to help teach it. I'm not a huge fan of his scheme, but still fair to wonder if it was scheme, or if players were just lost or not fit for the scheme.
I think he'll still be a terrific positions coach. [Reply]
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501:
Could be. But he was also teaching zone to a defense used to attacking, and was missing his defensive captain, head coach, and LBs coach to help teach it. I'm not a huge fan of his scheme, but still fair to wonder if it was scheme, or if players were just lost or not fit for the scheme.
I think he'll still be a terrific positions coach.
From a personal standpoint, Spags philosophies and mine differ too much; I wouldn't want him in any capacity.
He could probably have some success and help players in a 4-3 zone based scheme at both the LB and DB position. [Reply]
Not a fan of Crennel's scheme (too passive). Players love him but that doesn't necessarily translate to playing well. Crennel should probably retire. [Reply]