Originally Posted by staylor26:
No "shift" at all dumbass.
I'm sure your expectations when trading away multiple early picks and players, while also giving a top of the market QB contract, wasn't a Super Bowl contender, Jan.
I’m talking about the shift from your request for the “receipt” to “bury” me, then claiming it doesn’t make a difference.
But you have caught me in this respect: I expected that trading for a perennial pro bowl QB would make denver significantly better. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
I’m talking about the shift from your request for the “receipt” to “bury” me, then claiming it doesn’t make a difference.
But you have caught me in this respect: I expected that trading for a perennial pro bowl QB would make denver significantly better.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
You're such a disingenuous bundle of sticks :-)
You 100% had high expectations, like every Bronco fan. Stop lying.
Now you’re quibbling over semantics. But Sassy posted important evidence demonstrating that I didn’t think or claim that Denver was a championship caliber team after the Wilson trade. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
Now you’re quibbling over semantics. But Sassy posted important evidence demonstrating that I didn’t think or claim that Denver was a championship caliber team after the Wilson trade.
For the third time, the original point was that you were clearly a big fan of the worst trade in NFL history. An objectively far worse take than the ones you brought up from 2015. [Reply]
Originally Posted by manchambo:
I don’t think this is crazy based on what’s happened so far. Wilson has performed when the game was in the line. That includes the first game, where Wilson’s performance was stopped by Hackett’s epic stupidity.
Originally Posted by manchambo:
At a minimum, it is hard to evaluate exactly where Wilson is unless and until he is provided with competent play calling.
