It was Sean Payton's plan to get Dak Prescott to the Broncos all along. The NFL's real #4 pared with the General's ability to select offensive stars. Will put Tom Brady's legacy on notice [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
Dak was a better prospect than Bo and he went ridiculously later. Bo at 12 is one of thr bigger QB reaches in recent memory
It was such a blatant, pathetic reach that only a truly delusional fanbase would buy it as anything but. [Reply]
Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
Whatever happened to Tombstone gives BJ? He used to always tell us how we were wearing clown shoes. But when it turned out that he was looking in a mirror and that it was actually him wearing the clown shoes, he disappeared. Along with Kramzitinhistectum, those 2 are but are but a distant memory now.
Tombstone PLEASE come back and tell us again how much of a REACH Mahomes was. :-)
Kramz, PLEASE come back and brag about your **back to back Super Bowl Titles...:-)
My question to both of you lame turds is what's it like to have 4 Super Bowl Titles? Never mind...:-)
**Denver Broncos violated the salary cap during back to back super bowl seasons. [Reply]
Hilarious how quiet they are. Look back at how boisterous they were in the 5 head era and before. After Mahomes got drafted and they saw game 1 he was a HOF QB...it's been crickets since
Has their ever been a more impressive debut than his first season? Wow! [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pepe Silvia:
Kranz said that the Broncos never have to do anything ever again and that what they did alone in 97-98 can never be topped by any team. :-)
Exactly! He was so giddy when KC lost to Tampa, so they couldn't go back to back. FF three years and the Chiefs topped Denver yet again, because KC won back-to-back titles WITHOUT CHEATING. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Exactly! He was so giddy when KC lost to Tampa, so they couldn't go back to back. FF three years and the Chiefs topped Denver yet again, because KC won back-to-back titles WITHOUT CHEATING.
A 3 peat makes the Chiefs the best NFL franchise in history. No arguments. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BossChief:
That Nix pick was PURE desperation.
They shit their pants when they couldn’t get JJ and know next years QB class looks kinda weak.
It’s great how it’s all playing out how we knew it would.
They shouldve taken Bowers or best DPA and rolled with Stidham, etc for a year. They arent competing for anything this year SO why reach for a QB with little upside at #12? Why not add actual talent and go for a QB prospect with higher upside next year with more picks to make moves, and highly likely be picking in the top 5-7 range. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Exactly! He was so giddy when KC lost to Tampa, so they couldn't go back to back. FF three years and the Chiefs topped Denver yet again, because KC won back-to-back titles WITHOUT CHEATING.
Last year it was "you may have tied us in Super Bowls, but you didn't go back to back."
Now their best ammo is "our back to back team was better than yours." :-)
They know they have nothing left. KC's won as many SBs in the last 5 years as Denver has in their history. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Last year it was "you may have tied us in Super Bowls, but you didn't go back to back."
Now their best ammo is "our back to back team was better than yours." :-)
They know they have nothing left. KC's won as many SBs in the last 5 years as Denver has in their history.
They should be much more proud of the Peyton Manning - Von Miller Super Bowl. The back-to-back years were when they cheated the cap. To me neither of them really count. And there is certainly no way even with cheating that those teams were better than the Chiefs the last two years. For one they didn't have Mahomes on them, and instead had a guy that was statistically just a tad better than Dave Krieg. [Reply]