Dynasty discussion starts when you win 3 titles with the same core group, whether it is 5 years or a little more. Shows the team is consistently dominant. Cowboys were a short lived dynasty as they fell quick.
Steelers of the 70s and the Patriots run with Brady are the two strongest runs, with KC now nipping at their heels. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor:
I either found Blowmo or someone even dumber. Dungver a dynasty? :-):-)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Q Joe thinks Denver is in a dynasty right now. I think his criteria is beating the Chiefs at least once in a 17 game span and averaging 5+ wins per season. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Dynasty discussion starts when you win 3 titles with the same core group, whether it is 5 years or a little more. Shows the team is consistently dominant. Cowboys were a short lived dynasty as they fell quick.
Steelers of the 70s and the Patriots run with Brady are the two strongest runs, with KC now nipping at their heels.
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Dynasty discussion starts when you win 3 titles with the same core group, whether it is 5 years or a little more. Shows the team is consistently dominant. Cowboys were a short lived dynasty as they fell quick.
Steelers of the 70s and the Patriots run with Brady are the two strongest runs, with KC now nipping at their heels.
Well said. I believe the Pats had two separate dynasties. I’ve seen their fans try and combine them. [Reply]
