Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
If Denver trades up… dumbest play and I would want the GM taken to a cave and hidden forever. They need to either trade back and see what happens or bite the bullet and take Nix at 12. He’s not perfect, but I like him in this offense. Penix and the injury history is concerning to me, but I haven’t studied him or any of these guys to make the greatest decision. Maybe that qualifies me for their GM role.
The Broncos rotate HCs and QBs like a late summer windmill. They can't draft or FA well. Yet, the Ravens are steady at coaching. Draft and do well in FA, then waste it on a RB at QB. The Broncos do have some hope in a hot breeze blowing in [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
Supposedly Paton is so desperate he wants to trade Surtain and anything of value to get a mediocre prospect in JJ :-)
Looks like he finally came to his senses and realized that a QB is far more valuable than a CB when drafting high in the first round. Unfortunately it would be the wrong QB, [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
Denver is fucked. It's Zach Wilson and 7-10 or a Daniel Jones clone and mortaging future picks and an overrated CB :-)
Or trading back and getting Penix or Nix near the end of the 1st (fingers crossed) [Reply]
Unfortunately for Denver it's a sellers market. There are several teams that want those high picks and they all want the same players. Denver can outbid the others if they want, but the price will be extremely high. So, you can gut your team of players and picks to get your QB, or you can go without the QB. Pick your poison. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RedinTexas:
Unfortunately for Denver it's a sellers market. There are several teams that want those high picks and they all want the same players. Denver can outbid the others if they want, but the price will be extremely high. So, you can gut your team of players and picks to get your QB, or you can go without the QB. Pick your poison.
I am against the idea of trading up, it’s the least ideal scenario. [Reply]