Originally Posted by Molitoth: So many of you dig your heels in so fast when it comes to picking a side.
Truth is, nobody here knows shit...
Personally I'm just waiting to see what the Chiefs do with EB during the offseason. That will be telling if what is happening...
I'd say that article was proof of digging one's heels in. No one is saying that there aren't elements of that article that can't be true. However, a shit ton of loosely drawn conclusions mixed with other details that can't be verified = nonsense. I don't need a PHD in literature or philosophy to get to that conclusion on that EB hit piece. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
As I see it, there are only two possibilities at work:
1/ The sources were flimsy, the article received a lot of brushback, and they caved.
Or
2/ UChieffyBugger turned into Liam Neeson, tracked down Clay and Marty this morning, and now they're being held in his basement at gunpoint as sex slaves.
UChieffy been awfully quiet so far today.........
Someone called the Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board and told them to shut it down.
If none of it were true the Organization wouldn’t give a fuck.
Originally Posted by Molitoth:
So many of you dig your heels in so fast when it comes to picking a side.
I don't think that's happened much at all, at least not from the perspective of not believing any of it (of course, a lot of people believe everything they read).
The vast majority of the response is the article was clickbait fan fiction, and if you've read it, it's really hard to argue against that.
The vast majority also seems to fully be aware there could be shreds of truth within all the bullshit... most people I saw sharing or responding last night on Twitter and reddit were saying "IF any of this is true...", and it's probably one reason radio stations picked it up, to discuss the shreds of truth.
It was just written so poorly, it's hard to take any of it seriously. [Reply]
We've made a decision to take the EB story offline at this time. The reason and rationale is contained in the image below. We are not deleting the story nor are we re-writing it. This group is going to do the right thing, always. pic.twitter.com/A8fryV7l8f
It’s amazing how much a story like this can gain traction. Just make up anything you want, quote “unnamed” sources, sit back and watch how it unfolds. If people run with it, you get credit for it. If it doesn’t, you just retract it and wait till it all boils over. The entire time there is little to no truth to any of it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Raiderhader:
I’ve come to prefer them over Muscle Milk because Muscle Milk is non-dairy. Not that there is necessarily anything wrong with that but, don’t use milk in your name if there isn’t any.
Trying to figure out where to start here.
Muscle Milk uses milk protein concentrate/isolate, casein (from milk), and why protein (from milk) in their products.
Fairlife uses di-filtered milk which is basically a milk concentrate to make their product.
Other than the process used to concentrate milk into milk protein there isn't a ton of difference. They are both very much "dairy". [Reply]
