Originally Posted by :
A 28-year-old Lake Charles-area woman faces a bevy of charges after Louisiana police said she repeatedly had sex with a 13-year-old boy who she met at the Bible camp where she was a teacher/aide.
According to the Sulphur Daily News, Heather Daughdrill initiated the relationship in June and it continued until a complaint was filed in October. After her arrest on November 29, police told the paper that Daughdrill would pick her victim up from school without his parents' knowledge and subject him to sexual encounters. Louisiana cops also reportedly found sexually explicit texts between Daughdrill and her victim.
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
15 years per charge? JFC, this is so stupid. Did she rape these poor boys? We let more heinous crimes go unpunished. FFS! They're just getting their groove on!
hey, a guy in Osage City just got 4 years for cutting a guys head off and keeping it in his freezer to talk to. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
17 years old isn't really "lusting after young boys".
I disagree, especially since we don't know a thing about the boys. Immature? Mature? Boys tend to mature at different rates so that's impossible to ascertain without further data.
But if a "hot" 28 year old guy was arrested for banging 17 year old girls, the outrage would be exponentially greater. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
I disagree, especially since we don't know a thing about the boys. Immature? Mature? Boys tend to mature at different rates so that's immoossible to ascertain without further data.
But if a "hot" 28 year old guy was arrested for banging 17 year old girls, the outrage would be exponentially greater.
Would you have been willing to bet any amount of money that the man must have been molested as a child? [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
I disagree, especially since we don't know a thing about the boys. Immature? Mature? Boys tend to mature at different rates so that's immoossible to ascertain without further data.
But if a "hot" 28 year old guy was arrested for banging 17 year old girls, the outrage would be exponentially greater.
Originally Posted by Faddy Yomama:
13 is kinda young for this... I'd never congratulate the kid or the teacher for what they've accomplished.
13 is the age of the victim, and I use that term intentionally, mentioned in the OP.
This latest "victim" is 17. A very substantial difference, and I really don't think many, many, many years of jail for that makes any sense at all. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Amnorix:
13 is the age of the victim, and I use that term intentionally, mentioned in the OP.
This latest "victim" is 17. A very substantial difference, and I really don't think many, many, many years of jail for that makes any sense at all.
It doesn't make any sense for a person to get charged with the murder of two people when a woman is 5 months pregnant when that same woman can have an abortion a month later and it's perfectly legal.
And I'm not against abortion, just think $3it should be what it is... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Rausch:
It doesn't make any sense for a person to get charged with the murder of two people when a woman is 5 months pregnant when that same woman can have an abortion a month later and it's perfectly legal.
And I'm not against abortion, just think $3it should be what it is...
I agree. I don't think killing a fetus that could be legally aborted should result in a murder charge.
This came up recently in a truly gruesome case where some sicko carved the fetus out of a woman's body. No murder charge.
