Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Please tell me you actually believe this theory. :-):-)
Even if it had occurred, arguing that a poor playing surface that affected both teams was a bigger competitive advantage than deferring huge payments to the top players on the team is good stuff. I’m sure it was purely chance that it happened to coincide with the most loaded rosters in Broncos history (96-98), after years of struggling to put a great team around Elway.
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
KC beats Philly by multiple scores on a legit field, so fuck off
It's funny how the "Sodgate" theorists only mention the number of defenders that slipped. Seems convenient, given that KC's offensive players were sliding all over the field. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
It's funny how the "Sodgate" theorists only mention the number of defenders that slipped. Seems convenient, given that KC's offensive players were sliding all over the field. :-)
That doesn’t count. When it went KCs way it was clearly only because of the sod. When it went Philly’s way it was because they were the fourth bestest team ever after the three Broncos SB teams. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Deferring payments to players because you’re trying to fund a new stadium is nothing compared to Sodgate.
What is Sodgate, exactly? Can you walk me through it?
The league sent the Atlanta Braves groundskeeper to sabotage the Super Bowl field because they wanted to see more injuries? Or the coaches bribed Mangan because they knew KC had the better cleats? Where is the competitive advantage? Can you explain it to me? [Reply]
A fat arrogant piece of shit midget who robs from charities is going to take to coaching at age 34 when he's tried multiple times in his career to "do more" and become an actual elite QB, only for it to end in failure.
