Foles. :-)
Only in your psychotic mind does signing a backup represent a better philosophy than drafting a first rounder to develop.
Thanks nut job. Denver definitely needs KC fan's input on quarterbacks and superbowls.
[Reply]

There were just a few teams interested in Foles and the Broncos weren't one of the teams interested. Your delusional fantasy that somehow Dorsey screwed Elway by picking up Foles is hilarious. Foles signed with KC because of Reid. Your biggest question now is who does KC cut at QB?
[Reply]

It'll be Bray. In time, he could bring the kind game-changing arm and swagger that KC has been missing since it's inception. But, he's not safe and could create turnovers. Too much risk. Ergo, self-sabotage at the QB position will win the day again.
[Reply]

I suspect you are right....but IF Foles would have signed with the Donks....Donkey land would be celebrating since hw is better than any qb the Donks have now....you know it and we know it
[Reply]

Hah. No. Don't want a back up to be a place holder until we identify our next franchise QB, already have Sanchez for that.
[Reply]

Didnt Horseface just sign a back-up and draft a QB? One he had no intention of even keeping? The only difference between Foles and Sanchez is one has talent...and been a Pro-Bowl MVP...and registered the highest QBR in modern NFL history.

If you think they weren't in discussion about it...then your FO is doing a shitty job. He was cheap insurance.. They've been watching Sanchez suck all week...
[Reply]

Congrats on your 5th QB on a team that has captain check down as the best of 5 crappy choices. What other NFL team has two QB retreads, a never was QB, a midget QB and a rookie with the worst release of any of the drafted QBs? Only KC, because Chiefs.
[Reply]

I will take any 3 of them over the joke of quarterbacks in the Donks stable, but you go ahead and dis the Chiefs QB's if it makes you feel better.
[Reply]

I'll take a rookie with the most upside of any QB of in the draft. Sanchez has won more playoff games than your team has in the past 25 years.
[Reply]

It's true that Sanchez does well with a loaded team, but you'll need to up your running game a bit. If Snatchz pulls his head from his ass and returns to USC form, you'll be fine, but he has to get his confidence back.
[Reply]

Sanchez was our backups backup 2 years ago. He sucks and you know it.
[Reply]

Aww...that's cute. A team led by Sanchez talking shit about QBs.

Dont blame us...blame Elway. He did this to your team...

Smith whipped that donkey-ass in your house last year....back when you actually had presentable QBs. Even when Manning was putting up 50 TDS...they never issued a beating to the Chiefs like the one KC handed them.

Even the current version of Madden has the Donkos listed below the the Chiefs....on defense. HA. Obviously the only ones who still think they are great...are the hanger-on fans from the Manning era.

7-9 scurrying aimlessly around the AFCW drain for the foreseeable future....enjoy.
[Reply]

Guess that's why he was the first qb taken in the draft, right.
[Reply]

I'm not worried about Sanchez's long term viability at QB for the Broncos. I'm excited about the Broncos future. Broncos offense may struggle this coming year as the offense gels and Lynch is groomed as the eventual starter. But the Broncos won't suck, the defense is just too good.
[Reply]

if he has so much upside, then why did he fall to the end of the round? Oh. Maybe because of his 10 cent head. And Alex Smith has won more playoff games than the Chiefs have in the last 25 years. The failure of past regimes is moot. We are discussing now, so I don't see your point.
[Reply]