Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
I would imagine their WR group accounts for the majority of the injuries.
Their o-line had a ton of injuries as well. The big difference is that there's not as much evidence that the o-line injuries are a trend. All of those WR's have been hurt before, with regularity it seems
And their AGL this year was affected by a guy like Randy Gregory, who was just signed and then sat out almost the entire year. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Their o-line had a ton of injuries as well. The big difference is that there's not as much evidence that the o-line injuries are a trend. All of those WR's have been hurt before, with regularity it seems
And their AGL this year was affected by a guy like Randy Gregory, who was just signed and then sat out almost the entire year.
:-) Every time I see that, ever single time.:-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Their o-line had a ton of injuries as well. The big difference is that there's not as much evidence that the o-line injuries are a trend. All of those WR's have been hurt before, with regularity it seems
And their AGL this year was affected by a guy like Randy Gregory, who was just signed and then sat out almost the entire year.
Yeah, nobody saw that happening with Gregory... such a spare. Avoid injury prone guys that 'break out' in their final contract year. That should be a known thing by now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Yeah, nobody saw that happening with Gregory... such a spare. Avoid injury prone guys that 'break out' in their final contract year. That should be a known thing by now.
Exactly. The injuries on the line may have bene a one time thing, at least the evidence supports the idea.
The WR's on the other hand, are now a trend. Whether it's just that the players are fragile, the training staff isn't doing something right, or the field conditions introduce an extra injury risk we don't see, the injuries to the WR corps are now a recurring theme and it should be worrisome.
Which leaves us with Randy Gregory - everybody and their dog could have predicted this outcome. It was just a dumb move by Paton. Should have known better. [Reply]
AGL accounts for both absent players and those playing at less than 100%, and it gives more weight to injuries to expected starters and situational players than to expected backups.
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
You realize most of those games missed were by guys that either suck or aren't changing a game. You do realize that right?
Hey now, that's no way to talk about a top five roster :-) [Reply]
"Originally posted by Yerner View Post
He hasnt done anything good. We’re in a worse situation then when he got here. Both in assets and talent. His drafts have been analyzed on multiple websites as being strictly average despite the narrative you Paton dickriders keep repeating."
"His first draft was a home run, his 2nd draft was solid and we are better off roster wise than when he got here...but sure, your stance makes sense.
We also have a legit starting QB, even though he shit the bed last year."
And yes I took a silkwood shower after going there - one guy gets it. The general sucks balls. He is in the minority however as displayed by the response.
donks never learn - and those miniscule few that do are roundly called out as heretics.
Please let the draft and training camp start..... [Reply]
