There's going to be a ton of good and bad reviews coming out of camp. As for Lynch, he just has to get a lot of reps and focus, let him get knocked around in camp and the preseason and go from there.
Wonder how they'll play the QBs in the preseason game. My guess is Lynch will get a lot of late 3rd/4th quarter action against spares, but at this point, he just needs anything he can get.
Barring injury, there's no way Sanchez isn't the starter for the first month. Of course they're going to build up this notion of a battle, but c'mon. If they name him the guy now, then it's all downhill and criticizing everything from that point on.
Panthers, Colts, Bengals, Bucs... that's what Sanchez needs to worry about. How does he survive that early stretch. Go 2-2 and look decent and he keeps playing. Look like the idiotic butt fumbler and he's out. Meanwhile, Lynch gets to hide out in the background and play the "Yeah he's a rookie, but look what he's replacing" role. That will buy time and reset expectations with a fanbase still glowing in the SB win and expecting few bumps this season. [Reply]
He's 'having a day', eh? Pretty stellar. I forgot how much of a whipping it was during camp to get all these Twitter updates from people you follow. [Reply]
Originally Posted by LoneWolf:
It was only a matter of time before you started back with this bullshit. The closer the Chiefs get to the season opener, the closer you get to your next banning.
Looking at you guys schedule, its clear Big Don Stephenson wont even be in the lineup by the time we play you
He might not even make it past week 1 vs the Panthers, and at BEST he hangs on until week 3 vs the Bengals... and will then be yanked at the half [Reply]
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724:
Cecil Lammey is on the radio and is giving Donald Stephenson a ton of love. Said that he thinks Stephenson is our best FA signing this year. :-)
It's silly to look at this stuff at this point, but I was bored, so I put it in a spreadsheet and made some bets. Anyone that doesn't see this as KC's division to lose going into things is kidding themselves. I don't know how to gauge the Chargers, they perplex me. That being said, I do think this is going to be a tight race.
How exactly does this donk math work? 3 teams go .500 in the division with KC going 4-2? You do know that wins in the division have to equal losses in the division when you include all 4 teams right? [Reply]
Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
How exactly does this donk math work? 3 teams go .500 in the division with KC going 4-2? You do know that wins in the division have to equal losses in the division when you include all 4 teams right?
I posted the graphic... I'll go back and see if the spreadsheet formula screwed up.
Ok, found the error... I gave both Denver and SD wins in the game @ Denver, fixed that.