And receive Superbowl trophies from Johnathan Elway.
[Reply]

Is this a better choice than a healthy Smith that knows the playbook(mostly)? Honest question as I always default to “trust in Veach.”
[Reply]

**** how is Morris and Kingsley still our two LT options, blows my mind. We will probably pass on this unit and instead sign another WR practice squad cast away
[Reply]

No idea I’d I think they’ll do anything but at this point….JAG+ is an improvement
[Reply]

Oh shit, yeah this makes way too much sense not to happen. Get this done Blanch Vitale!
[Reply]

Depends what their plans are for the position. If they’re set on Kingsley next year no matter what, then Smith would be your best bet, but I hope to God that’s not their plan.

However, I almost think they’d be foolish not to look into this long term. We need a goddamn LT, and this guy has at least 3-4 more good years in him if he’s healthy. We’re losing Trey next year so the interior is already going to be weaker. This would fill a massive short-term and long-term need without having to wait until the offseason to do it.

This really needs to happen.
[Reply]

He could be doing this next week
[Reply]

Can he play LT?

Wait, wut?
[Reply]

This would be outstanding, but I wouldn't hold my breath

Andy is bullheaded to a fault about the O line
[Reply]

Hey Bart, Have we bring him in to sign this lunchpail who live close to the ship yet?
[Reply]

IMO, this is the only guy available that if healthy as advertised would be an actual upgrade over either of our OT's.

With that said, DJ is right. They aren't making a move this late in the year.

Pat "doesn't trust" who he has now, can't imagine they give him more to think about 12 weeks into the season.
[Reply]

I feel pretty confident that if they can afford him, they'll do it. If for no other reason, Morris always seems to get hurt even though he typically comes back. There's no way they trust anybody other than him at this point.
[Reply]

I hope you're right.
[Reply]

Me thinks we're going all in as is at this point. Don't see it.
[Reply]

[Reply]