I just feel like everyone is going to spend all week talking about Mahomes' ankle or Burrow being a Demigod or Chase against this young secondary or Lou Anarumo being a psychopath...and then in the end it's just going to Samaje Perine bludgeoning Bolton and Gay to death.
You’re my boy, blue. But isn’t it chicken soup for the soul when you get a win against the dregs of the league? We could probably put together a CP team with Clay at RB and beat the Fade! [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor:
You’re my boy, blue. But isn’t it chicken soup for the soul when you get a win against the dregs of the league? We could probably put together a CP team with Clay at RB and beat the Fade!
All Jr. 150 yards in 8 games...Bengals "star rookie" injures knee...i must have missed what he did to become some big loss that the media is saying it is [Reply]
Originally Posted by rfaulk34:
Ok dimwit. Time for your lesson.
I made the claim you need 2 of 3 out of Oline, running game and defense to win rings, in response to Pablo saying "But he'd NEVER let his team get in a 3-6 hole. Just isn't it him ya know?". You asked how many of Mahomes SBs did he have that, so i posted the results.
You said cherry picked and moving goal posts and claimed i was using ypa and ypg when it fit the narrative.
1. Nothing was cherry picked. I made a specific claim and showed results for exactly what i claimed.
2. No goal posts were moved because my claim and my results were based on the exact same thing and that never changed.
3. I never used ypa and ypg interchangeably. In ever single instance, i only cited ypc--never once using ypg--with the exception of 2019 when you had a bad running game in-season, across the board, so i didn't even bother showing ypc.
That's 3 things that you're completely wrong about from the very beginning.
If you look at the numbers i posted, i used two examples. Regular season and Super Bowl for each SB season. In the regular season running stats, i cited the ypc because that's important in being able to move the chains. In the SB it was simply to show how effective the running game was in that single game.
I don't give two monkey shits about how good or bad your running game is in-season because in 17 games, you can be good and bad week to week. In the single Super Bowl game, it's much more important. In every single one of KCs Super Bowls you had good numbers running the ball--averaging 131 yards in the 4 games. The worst being 2020 when you only ran it 17 times for 107 yards, but you ran it for 6.3ypc in that game. I also couldn't give two Llama spits about how much of that is Mahomes because the claim is about yards on the ground and it fits for every team exactly the same.
To answer your question directly, Pat had at least 2 out of 3 of those things 3 times and they won all 3 of those games. In 1 of those games, he only had 1 of those 3 things and they lost the game.
Now that i've conclusively shown that you don't know what the hell you're talking about and you don't even have the slightest clue about what the discussion is...feel free to post something completely dumb that continues to show you don't know what the **** you're talking about.
So, you used season stats because its important but you also don't give a shit about regular season stats. Makes sense. Especially since most of your other posts are about burrow's regular season stats. LOL...
But you're not moving the goalposts, right?
You didn't make "a specific" claim. Your claim continually shifted based on the data and the point you needed to make. Sometimes you use season stats to prove your point, other times (when the season stats didn't support your argument) you used stats only from the Super Bowl). So, you can claim Mahomes had a running game based on either season results OR stats from the Super Bowl, regardless of how much he contributed to that stat himself. So, if burrow lacks a running game he should take off more himself then, right??? Since, it doesn't matter how the yardage is produced (even though your claim is that a QB needs a running game, not that a team needs a running game). But you're definitely not moving any goalposts, right?
You typed all of that just to further demonstrate your ignorance and/or cognitive dissonance. [Reply]
1. You consider the 2019 Chiefs oline good... lol
2. Bengals have more than one draft pick per draft. Chiefs drafted Creed and Trey in the same draft, for example. Bengals could have drafted Sewell AND another lineman. Radical idea, huh? ESPECIALLY since, having a line is more important than WR's, right? [Reply]
Originally Posted by rfaulk34:
I'll answer that question in 24 hours.
So the Chiefs are losing tonight?
I mean, sure, anything is possible, I suppose. It is an NFC game which is pretty meaningless in tiebreak scenarios for playoff seeding, so I guess if they are going to lose one anytime soon, I'd probably want it to be this game frankly.
That said, even if we do lose tonight, that will be 1/5th of the Bengals losses for the year, so yeah . . . . . [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor:
You’re my boy, blue. But isn’t it chicken soup for the soul when you get a win against the dregs of the league? We could probably put together a CP team with Clay at RB and beat the Fade!
