You guys do realize this bet was already settled right? This bet was made prior to the 2022 season and I’m pretty sure we had the one seed and won the Super Bowl that season.
[Reply]

:-)

What a :-)

Not even because of this prediction, but because they went on to win a SB, and he was right back to being a miserable fuck again.
[Reply]

That’s the thing that I find most spectacular. He did this same nonsense last year, we won a SB, and then we have some struggles and he’s crowing about how he’s been so right and clearly relishes our failures.

I was at 10-7 at the beginning of last year as well. TEX and I were entirely aligned in terms of the loss of Hill. But then by the Bucs and 49ers games it was eminently clear that this team could roll with their new offense and I was all-in. And now I give them the benefit of the doubt rather than constantly setting my expectations at rock bottom so I can protect my emotions if they don’t win a SB again.

TEX is 0-1 but acts like he’s 2000-0.
[Reply]

and others were posting this:



[Reply]

nah. not everyone man. we were down 14 early. that's nothing to patrick.

I was actually pleasantly surprised how few people showed their ass
[Reply]

the chiefs scored 21 points in 18 minutes of game time and that was that

it was a mini-me version of "the quarter" from 2019 in oakland
[Reply]

Tex's takes are just incredibly bad so I'll say it.

Tex is a moron who couldn't analyze the alphabet in a class full of kindergartners.
[Reply]

Puts his M&M's in alphabetical order.
[Reply]

Tex has a Cowboy Butts Drive Me Nuts bumper sticker on his Wrangler with ducks all over the dashboard
[Reply]

Are you honestly expecting ANYONE to go full homer, when CLYDE EDWARDS HELAIRE is called upon to run UP THE MIDDLE on the mother ****ing GOAL LINE, when Isaiah Pacheco has not broken both of his legs and is available to run that play instead?

You're REALLY going to bitch about someone pointing out the hilariously awful personnel choice, and then not freaking out, but simply saying, hey, give it to the right guy here, and we're in? That's what you consider NEGATIVE?

Honestly, just fist yourself. You're obviously ****ed in half upstairs beyond reason, and your fingertip grip on reality has failed, plunging you into an abyss of irreversible stupidity if you think calling for Pacheco to run the football instead of Clyde is a negative.

It's not a negative, it's just simple common ****ing sense.

If shit could shit, it still wouldn't be as shitty as Clyde runs the football. That's fact. Call it whatever you want and I'm sure you, and reeruns like Rasputin who called Clyde " The next Priest Holmes" are rabidly smashing that thumbs down over it, but it changes nothing.

Clyde should NEVER run the football if ANYONE else is conscious and can take a handoff.
[Reply]

Fucking hell. This place is amazing. :-)
[Reply]

LOLZ.
[Reply]

Position coaches choose which players get plays during a game. Andy trusts his coaches - it’s what good leaders do.
[Reply]

Why would you TRUST someone who orchestrated a Chicago Bears SHITSHOW?

Ever think that MAYBE that's how you get a SHITSHOW in KANSAS CITY where the receivers drop half their targets and the LEAST talented skill position player on offense gets MEANINGFUL carries in close games that LOSE those games?

How can you LEAD a team by telling the WORST players to play more?
[Reply]

Caps locking words for emphasis is corny.
[Reply]