Originally Posted by Razaele:
Donk fans must hate what happened to the Chargers, because there's no way anyone would choose to be the head donkey over the Chargers' job
I was actually worried when the Chargers were up by 27, thinking that we would end up giving up a 1st for Payton. I’d much rather have Harbaugh, Ryans or Evero. Maybe even Quinn, considering the 1st. [Reply]
Originally Posted by PattyFlakes:
Payton will end up in Dallas or LA, there is no way he’s serious about the dumpster fire in DEN. Have fun with Dan Quinn next season.
The NFC is just an easier path to success, I wouldn’t blame him for taking the Cowboys job.
Taking the Chargers job is just silly. He’s going to be stuck with the cheapest owner in the NFL, in a much tougher conference that is filled to the brim with franchise QB’s. Being stuck in the same division as the richest owner in the NFL, who is just going to spend his dick off to hire another elite HC, doesn’t sound very appealing either. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The NFC is just an easier path to success, I wouldn’t blame him for taking the Cowboys job.
Taking the Chargers job is just silly. He’s going to be stuck with the cheapest owner in the NFL, in a much tougher conference that is filled to the brim with franchise QB’s. Being stuck in the same division as the richest owner in the NFL, who is just going to spend his dick off to hire another elite HC, doesn’t sound very appealing either.
I count two (Mahomes and Herbert) and he'd be coaching one of them. Granted, I wouldn't want to face Mahomes, but the other QBs are absolute loser trash. [Reply]
Why spend all that draft capital and money for a loser like fatrus when you could have acquired a winner like Purdy for almost nothing?
Lynch may be a complete idiot for spending THREE firsts on Lance, but even his dumb ass knows you don't mortgage the farm (give up the farm/mortgage the future) for a loser like fatrus when you can get a player like Purdy for very little. [Reply]
Broncos hired Vance Joseph
Interviewed but did not hire Kyle Shanahan
Did not interview Sean McVay
Did not interview Sean McDermott
Broncos hired Vic Fangio
Did not interview Matt LaFleur
Did not interview Dan Campbell
Interviewed but did not hire Zac Taylor
Broncos hired Nathaniel Hackett
Did not interview Mike McDaniel
Did not interview Doug Pederson(jags were first)
Did not interview Brian Daboll(mind was made up)
Interviewed but did not hire Kevin O’Connell [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
All the Chargers have over the Broncos is a young QB. Sean Payton emphasized that the ownership/front office situation is the most important factor for him. Dean Spanos is notoriously cheap. It’s going to be hard for him to match what the Broncos’ ownership can offer.
Yeah, Payton probably doesn’t care about having a much better and younger QB. Or much better receivers and edge rushers. Or better weather.
FYI, living a few miles from where the Chargers are building their new training facility might be a factor… [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The NFC is just an easier path to success, I wouldn’t blame him for taking the Cowboys job.
Taking the Chargers job is just silly. He’s going to be stuck with the cheapest owner in the NFL, in a much tougher conference that is filled to the brim with franchise QB’s. Being stuck in the same division as the richest owner in the NFL, who is just going to spend his dick off to hire another elite HC, doesn’t sound very appealing either.
Setting aside the fact that there’s no evidence that a member of the notoriously cheap and greedy Walton family is going to spend a lot (and spent much less than the Chargers this year)…
This guy actually thinks that a coach would be worried about being in the same division as Denver? His homerism knows no bounds. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The NFC is just an easier path to success, I wouldn’t blame him for taking the Cowboys job.
Taking the Chargers job is just silly. He’s going to be stuck with the cheapest owner in the NFL, in a much tougher conference that is filled to the brim with franchise QB’s. Being stuck in the same division as the richest owner in the NFL, who is just going to spend his dick off to hire another elite HC, doesn’t sound very appealing either.
:-) Terrible take. The Chargers job is far more appealing than Denver by far. They have a young franchise QB, talent across the board, and are located in Southern California. You are such a blind homer that you refuse to acknowledge that Denver is not the prize you think it is despite everyone saying so. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The NFC is just an easier path to success, I wouldn’t blame him for taking the Cowboys job.
Taking the Chargers job is just silly. He’s going to be stuck with the cheapest owner in the NFL, in a much tougher conference that is filled to the brim with franchise QB’s. Being stuck in the same division as the richest owner in the NFL, who is just going to spend his dick off to hire another elite HC, doesn’t sound very appealing either.
Originally Posted by tredadda: :-) Terrible take. The Chargers job is far more appealing than Denver by far. They have a young franchise QB, talent across the board, and are located in Southern California. You are such a blind homer that you refuse to acknowledge that Denver is not the prize you think it is despite everyone saying so.
The charger's job is not better. Choker QB. The worst ownership in the league. No stadium. No draw. No good. No money. No love. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
The charger's job is not better. Choker QB. The worst ownership in the league. No stadium. No draw. No good. No money. No love.
If only everyone could just will sentences into truth.
Leprechauns are real. The earth revolves around Jupiter. Gravity is a myth. Pizza is the healthiest of foods.
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
The charger's job is not better. Choker QB. The worst ownership in the league. No stadium. No draw. No good. No money. No love.
