Since a number of cool things are happening in space exploration these days, we'll widen the scope of this thread a smidge. Conversation about all things space exploration are welcome, whether it be from NASA, SpaceX, ULA, Blue Origin, or anyone else. Chances are most of the discussion will still be about SpaceX since they love to make things public and fun, but nothing's off limits. I'll eventually get around to modifying the OP to include resources for other companies too, but in the meantime, feel free to post any cool stuff you run across.
Tim Dodd (Everyday Astronaut) - A "random dude" who got really into space (particularly SpaceX). He's a great resource for simple explanations of this stuff, as well as live hosting launches.
USLaunchReport - Lost of videos of the more mundane stuff (e.g., booster recovery operations). Not a ton of commentary.
NASASpaceFlight - Live hosting of most launches including a ton of video of Starlink operations.
Glossary
Spoiler!
Space discussions tend to get a little bogged down in jargon, so here's a list of terms you might encounter. (Others, please let me know of others that should be added.)
ASDS - Autonomous Spaceport Droneship - The "barges" that they sometimes land rockets on.
Dragon - The cone-shaped capsule that sits at the top of the rocket for ISS-bound launches that holds the cargo (or, in the future, humans).
F9 - Falcon 9, the name of the rocket itself.
FH - Falcon Heavy, the three-booster version.
GTO - Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit, a type of orbit that will eventually result in the satellite orbiting the earth as it turns so that it seems to be in the same spot from the ground (such as DirecTV or Dish satellites). These types of launches are particularly challenging because they require a lot of power to get them into the right orbit, leaving very little fuel left for landing.
HIF - Horizontal Integration Facility - the building near the launch pad where they put all of the pieces of the rocket together before rolling it out to the pad.
ISS - The International Space Station
JRTI - Just Read The Instructions, the name of the "barge" that they land on for west-coast launches.
LEO - Low Earth Orbit, a fairly low orbit shared by many satellites and ISS. These launches usually require less power to achieve the proper orbit, so the first stage can often be landed back on land rather than on a drone ship.
LZ1 - Landing Zone 1, basically a big open slab of concrete at Cape Canaveral where the first stage will attempt to land (for some launches).
NET - No Earlier Than, basically the date they're hoping to launch, but rocket launches have a tendency of getting delayed.
OCISLY - Of Course I Still Love You, the name of the "barge" that they land on for east-coast launches.
RTLS - Return to Landing Site, a mission where the first stage comes back and lands at LZ1.
Starship - SpaceX's next-generation rocket (and spacecraft) that will hopefully one day take us to Mars. Starship is the "second stage" that will carry cargo or people, but also refers to the whole system. (It's confusing, but think of it like the Space Shuttle, which was both the shuttle itself and the entire launch system.)
Super Heavy - The giant booster that will carry Starship to space.
Originally Posted by 4th and Long:
In fear of this thread moving to DC, I'll just say that your idea would take away a lot of hard working American jobs.
Nothing to do with DC or politics, this is simply the FAA moving too slowly to keep up with the pace of the likes of SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab and other companies working very hard to get us to where we need to be. Publish something that says how long approval will take, make sure it's fair, set a deadline to approve, and if the FAA can't meet the published timetable for approval the launch event is automatically approved. Furthermore, if the answer is no, they need to publish why, and let their reason stand the test of public scrutiny. [Reply]
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
Nothing to do with DC or politics, this is simply the FAA moving too slowly to keep up with the pace of the likes of SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab and other companies working very hard to get us to where we need to be. Publish something that says how long approval will take, make sure it's fair, set a deadline to approve, and if the FAA can't meet the published timetable for approval the launch event is automatically approved. Furthermore, if the answer is no, they need to publish why, and let their reason stand the test of public scrutiny.
Nothing moves too slow to keep up with Blue Origin [Reply]
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
Nothing to do with DC or politics, this is simply the FAA moving too slowly to keep up with the pace of the likes of SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab and other companies working very hard to get us to where we need to be. Publish something that says how long approval will take, make sure it's fair, set a deadline to approve, and if the FAA can't meet the published timetable for approval the launch event is automatically approved. Furthermore, if the answer is no, they need to publish why, and let their reason stand the test of public scrutiny.
How will @SpaceX catch Starship's Super Heavy booster with a giant robotic tower? Here's my full video giving you a rundown on how exactly they plan to do this daring catch maneuver!!! #IFT5pic.twitter.com/wNi1Vlw89w
How will @SpaceX catch Starship's Super Heavy booster with a giant robotic tower? Here's my full video giving you a rundown on how exactly they plan to do this daring catch maneuver!!! #IFT5pic.twitter.com/wNi1Vlw89w
