Easy. So far this season he’s doubled his yards per game from last season. If he doubles it again for a few more seasons, he’ll have a 13,000 yard season to his name, and they’ll have to put him in the hall. [Reply]
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
Easy. So far this season he’s doubled his yards per game from last season. If he doubles it again for a few more seasons, he’ll have a 13,000 yard season to his name, and they’ll have to put him in the hall.
Wow, that's a hell of a take. Hill is halfway to the top club below and Sutton is about halfway to Hill. I'm a big fan of Sutton, but he should focus on being better than Rod Smith at this point and we should all be happy if he gets to that level.
Top WRs that are not in the HOF:
14k+ club
Steve Smith
Reggie Wayne
Andre Johnson
13k+ club
Anquan Boldin
Henry Ellard
Julio Jones
Torry Holt
Jason Witten
12k+ club
Irving Fryar
Brandon Marshall
Antonio Brown
Jimmy Smith
Hines Ward
Derrick Mason [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
How could you possibly think that Sutton has a better chance to reach the HOF than Hill, based on what we've seen?
That's more ridiculous than saying that Smith-Schuster is on a HOF trajectory.
I didn't say that either, and I am not getting into a nonsensical argument over it either. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Wow, that's a hell of a take. Hill is halfway to the top club below and Sutton is about halfway to Hill. I'm a big fan of Sutton, but he should focus on being better than Rod Smith at this point and we should all be happy if he gets to that level.
Top WRs that are not in the HOF:
14k+ club
Steve Smith
Reggie Wayne
Andre Johnson
13k+ club
Anquan Boldin
Henry Ellard
Julio Jones
Torry Holt
Jason Witten
12k+ club
Irving Fryar
Brandon Marshall
Antonio Brown
Jimmy Smith
Hines Ward
Derrick Mason
No, I知 pretty sure if he keeps doubling his numbers he値l be in. That means:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
I didn't say that either, and I am not getting into a nonsensical argument over it either.
What's nonsensical is denying that it was implied.
Right...you're just saying that one player is on a HOF trajectory and the other is iffy. Not sure how that could be interpreted as anything other than thinking he has a better chance.
How exactly is he on a HOF trajectory? Do you think anyone but a Denver fan would agree with that? [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
What's nonsensical is denying that it was implied.
Right...you're just saying that one player is on a HOF trajectory and the other is iffy. Not sure how that could be interpreted as anything other than thinking he has a better chance.
How exactly is he on a HOF trajectory? Do you think anyone but a Denver fan would agree with that?
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
Waller, Renfro, and Adams against that soft secondary? Crosby and Chandler against a shit O line? Not happening, Broncos fans sorry
I think I saw that Chandler has sacked Russack 16 times. More than against any other QB. Oh, and on the other side is Crosby, that's all.
And on offense is easily the best set of weapons they've faced yet. Without the thin air advantage.
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
Vegas is not starting 0-4. Raiders have the better roster, are due for a win, and will receive slanted officiating
Probably, I値l still throw 20-16 Denver out there. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
Waller, Renfro, and Adams against that soft secondary? Crosby and Chandler against a shit O line? Not happening, Broncos fans sorry
Renfrow and Moreau are out vs Denver. Davante Adams might as well be out because PS2 is going to be following him all over the field.
This is going to be a double digit victory for the Broncos. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Renfrow and Moreau are out vs Denver. Davante Adams might as well be out because PS2 is going to be following him all over the field.
This is going to be a double digit victory for the Broncos.
What? I知 not sure that痴 possible. You guys average 3 ppg :-) [Reply]
