ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Home Today's Posts
Page 331 of 731
« First < 231281321327328329330331 332333334335341381431 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>New Conference re-alignment thread
Saulbadguy 07:57 AM 09-12-2011
The old one has AIDS.

Anyways, Chip Brown from Orangebloods.com reports OU may apply to the Pac-12 by the end of the month.

Oklahoma will apply for membership to the Pac-12 before the end of the month, and Oklahoma State is expected to follow suit, a source close to OU's administration told Orangebloods.com.

Even though Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said Friday the Pac-12 was not interested in expansion at this time, OU's board of regents is fed up with the instability in the Big 12, the source said.

The OU board of regents will meet within two weeks to formalize plans to apply for membership to the Pac-12, the source said.

Messages left Sunday night with OU athletic director Joe Castiglione and Oklahoma State athletic director Mike Holder were not immediately returned.

If OU follows through with what appears to be a unanimous sentiment on the seven-member Oklahoma board of regents to leave the Big 12, realignment in college athletics could be heating back up. OU's application would be matched by an application from Oklahoma State, the source said, even though OSU president Burns Hargis and mega-booster Boone Pickens both voiced their support for the Big 12 last Thursday.

There is differing sentiment about if the Pac-12 presidents and chancellors are ready to expand again after bringing in Colorado and Utah last year and landing $3 billion TV contracts from Fox and ESPN. Colorado president Bruce Benson told reporters last week CU would be opposed to any expansion that might bring about east and west divisions in the Pac-12.

Currently, there are north and south divisions in the Pac-12. If OU and OSU were to join, Larry Scott would have to get creative.

Scott's orginal plan last summer was to bring in Colorado, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State and put them in an eastern division with Arizona and Arizona State. The old Pac-8 schools (USC, UCLA, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State) were to be in the west division.

Colorado made the move in June 2010, but when Texas A&M was not on board to go west, the Big 12 came back together with the help of its television partners (ABC/ESPN and Fox).

If Oklahoma and Oklahoma State were accepted into the Pac-12, there would undoubtedly be a hope by Larry Scott that Texas would join the league. But Texas sources have indicated UT is determined to hang onto the Longhorn Network, which would not be permissible in the Pac-12 in its current form.

Texas sources continue to indicate to Orangebloods.com that if the Big 12 falls apart, the Longhorns would consider "all options."

Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe held an emergency conference call 10 days ago with league presidents excluding Oklahoma, Texas and Texas A&M and asked the other league presidents to "work on Texas" because Beebe didn't think the Pac-12 would take Oklahoma without Texas.

Now, it appears OU is willing to take its chances with the Pac-12 with or without Texas.

There seemed to be a temporary pause in any possible shifting of the college athletics' landscape when Baylor led a charge to tie up Texas A&M's move to the Southeastern Conference in legal red tape. BU refused to waive its right to sue the SEC over A&M's departure from the Big 12, and the SEC said it would not admit Texas A&M until it had been cleared of any potential lawsuits.

Baylor, Kansas and Iowa State have indicated they will not waive their right to sue the SEC.

It's unclear if an application by OU to the Pac-12 would draw the same threats of litigation against the Pac-12 from those Big 12 schools.

Stay tuned.
[Reply]
KChiefs1 02:08 PM 10-15-2011
At the Mizzou vs ISU game. No Big XII signage anywhere! They have been taken off the field & end zones & around the stadium. Looks like a done deal.
[Reply]
Dante84 02:11 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by KChiefs1:
At the Mizzou vs ISU game. No Big XII signage anywhere! They have been taken off the field & end zones & around the stadium. Looks like a done deal.
Yeah, that's the determining factor.
[Reply]
Saul Good 02:13 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by Dante84:
Yeah, that's the determining factor.
Why would they go to the effort to remove it otherwise? From what I've heard from people at the game, it sounds like they really had to carve up the ground to remove the logo.
[Reply]
kstater 02:14 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by KChiefs1:
At the Mizzou vs ISU game. No Big XII signage anywhere! They have been taken off the field & end zones & around the stadium. Looks like a done deal.
Hope it's true. With Mizzou being in good standing and all. I'm fairly certain displaying signage is a requirement.
[Reply]
mnchiefsguy 02:15 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by kstater:
Hope it's true. With Mizzou being in good standing and all. I'm fairly certain displaying signage is a requirement.
Link to the requirement? They may not have bothered with signage since there was no TV for the game.
[Reply]
SPchief 02:15 PM 10-15-2011
Is that the reason they didn't want the game on tv?
[Reply]
Frazod 02:17 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by SPchief:
Is that the reason they didn't want the game on tv?
That certainly makes more sense than the big FUCK YOU to all non-local fans that it seemed like.
[Reply]
Saul Good 02:18 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy:
Link to the requirement? They may not have bothered with signage since there was no TV for the game.
From what I've read elsewhere, they had to really scalp the field to remove it. It was done intentionally.
[Reply]
Saul Good 02:18 PM 10-15-2011
Wouldn't surprise me if a student did it.
[Reply]
mnchiefsguy 02:19 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by SPchief:
Is that the reason they didn't want the game on tv?
Maybe. I have read that they did not want the game starting at 11:10 because of the homecoming parade, activities, etc. Not sure what not having the logos on the field means. With no TV, maybe they did not want to pay for the extra grounds keeping? Maybe they are sending a message to the Big XII? Both of those seem unlikely to me.
[Reply]
Mr. Plow 02:55 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
Why would they go to the effort to remove it otherwise? From what I've heard from people at the game, it sounds like they really had to carve up the ground to remove the logo.

Why would they go through the effort of removing it NOW....you know, while they are still members of the Big 12 and in the middle of the year?

I could understand after they have officially left the Big 12, but now?
[Reply]
Saul Good 02:59 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by Mr. Plow:
Why would they go through the effort of removing it NOW....you know, while they are still members of the Big 12 and in the middle of the year?

I could understand after they have officially left the Big 12, but now?
Hopefully it's because there's an announcement coming at homecoming tonight.
[Reply]
notorious 03:00 PM 10-15-2011
Bye.
[Reply]
KChiefs1 03:02 PM 10-15-2011
Mike Kelly just openly mocked Texas in the radio broadcast! Hilarious!
[Reply]
Bowser 03:04 PM 10-15-2011
Originally Posted by KChiefs1:
Mike Kelly just openly mocked Texas in the radio broadcast! Hilarious!
What'd he say?
[Reply]
Page 331 of 731
« First < 231281321327328329330331 332333334335341381431 > Last »
Up

vBulletin; Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.