The mighty Bills from Buffalo will take the AFC this year.
For two decades I watched people say the Patriots window was closed, that their time was dwindling, that it was all over… seemingly every time those predictions happened, the Patriots went and won another Super Bowl.
A lot of doom talk simply because we lost to the Bengals in the playoffs. Let us not forget that the Bills watched their brother DIE on the field just a few weeks prior. Their heart was simply not in it. If it had been, the Bills would have captured the AFC last year.
The Bills have won 2 of their last 3 in Arrowhead and they’re ready to make it 3 of the last 4.
The more I think about it, BUF needs to get Davante Adams. It might be the only way McD saves his job. And it makes the most sense of the teams still looking at Adams.
It would also mean significantly less rushes for Josh, which should reduce Allen's chances of injury. And finally, it would make BUF a legit Sb contender this year. [Reply]
If they ate the 34 million because of Diggs' sexual allegations. Which could easily be bullshit. Trading for Adams would make for interesting conversations [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
The more I think about it, BUF needs to get Davante Adams. It might be the only way McD saves his job. And it makes the most sense of the teams still looking at Adams.
It would also mean significantly less rushes for Josh, which should reduce Allen's chances of injury. And finally, it would make BUF a legit Sb contender this year.
Chiefs - Give up star receiver in Tyreek Hill. Weather the storm. Acclimate. Adjust the offense. Rattle off two straight SB titles and start the 3rd year 5-0.
Bills - Give up "star" receiver in Diggs. Panic after 5 games. Freak out the offense does not look the same. Time to mortgage the future even more and put more money on the credit card for a near 32 year old diva wide receiver.
You'd think they'd have learned from going "all-in" for aging Von Miller. Davante has a lot of tred on those tires. His best football is behind him. [Reply]
