I'm just quoting from the same article that CP is citing as gospel.
[Reply]

And badly misinterpreting, apparently.

You actually believe that he hoped to get a bunch of high picks, a starting caliber TE, starting caliber D-lineman, AND a QB of the future? :-)

Or did he just want to add a QB who could compete with Smith until they find their franchise guy. No....that couldn't be it.
[Reply]

Yea, saying Lock was the QB he wanted doesn't mean that he thought he was going to be the QBOTF.

That's just the guy he wanted to take a flier on.

It's meaningless and anybody with half a brain would understand this.
[Reply]

The 49ers miraculously got Jimmy to sign off on a more backup-appropriate contract for a year.

Knowmo: "Golly they must really want him if they gave him a new contract!!!!"
[Reply]

this is going to be a montana in KC situation for denver

if you get blown out in an AFCCG (by mahomes), consider the trade a success
[Reply]

Montana was 37 and had thrown 21 passes combined in the previous 2 seasons when he started for KC. Wilson is 33 and has thrown 958 passes over the past 2 seasons. I’m not sure I see the comparison.

Also, if we get blown out in the AFCCG, it will obviously be by Allen.
[Reply]

They're not making the playoffs, so it's a mute point.
[Reply]

Exactly the case. :-)
[Reply]

The article says 10 IN FOUR GAMES. I know math is difficult, but that’s 3 more than you posted. Why??
[Reply]

If that's what happens, then it was totally pointless.
[Reply]

You turds won’t sniff the playoffs, which is a precursor to making the AFCCG. Don’t worry, we’ll send you a postcard.
[Reply]

So despite his regressions you think he’s a 7 year starter?
[Reply]

10 turnovers. 7 INTs. Maybe you can figure it out.

BTW, in the corresponding 4 game stretch by Mahomes, he had 2 fumbles, so just one fewer than Wilson.
[Reply]

wilson will be out of the league at 37

he's on his last legs
[Reply]

Speaking of regression (passer rating by year):


[Reply]